| 查看: 407 | 回复: 2 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
wang_xing11木虫 (知名作家)
不作金币奴隶的鎠虫虫
|
[交流]
考考你的阅读能力：马丁．路德．金的Letter from Birmingham City Jail的一段
|
||
|
Question: What reasoning method does the author use? Deductive or inductive? Since we so diligently urge people to obey the Supreme Court's decision of 1954 outlawing segregation in the public schools, at first glance it may seem rather paradoxical for us consciously to break laws. One may won ask: "How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?" The answer lies in the fact that there fire two types of laws: just and unjust. I would be the Brat to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that "an unjust law is no law at all" Now, what is the difference between the two? How does one determine whether a law is just or unjust? A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of St. Thomas Aquinas: An unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law. Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust. All segregation statutes are unjust because segregation distort the soul and damages the personality. It gives the segregator a false sense of superiority and the segregated a false sense of inferiority. Segregation, to use the terminology of the Jewish philosopher Martin Buber, substitutes an "I-it" relationship for an "I-thou" relationship and ends up relegating persons to the status of things. Hence segregation is not only politically, economically and sociologically unsound, it is morally wrong and awful. Paul Tillich said that sin is separation. Is not segregation an existential expression 'of man's tragic separation, his awful estrangement, his terrible sinfulness? Thus it is that I can urge men to obey the 1954 decision of the Supreme Court, for it is morally right; and I can urge them to disobey segregation ordinances, for they are morally wrong. 附件：全信的中英文 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
聘U V热熔胶研究人员
已经有10人回复
-
职称评审没过，求安慰
已经有7人回复
-
求助文献
已经有3人回复
-
垃圾破二本职称评审标准
已经有10人回复
-
投稿返修后收到这样的回复，还有希望吗
已经有8人回复
-
三无产品还有机会吗
已经有6人回复
-
博士申请都是内定的吗？
已经有14人回复
-
谈谈两天一夜的“延安行”
已经有13人回复
-
氨基封端PDMS和HDI反应快速固化
已经有11人回复
-
Applied Surface Science 这个期刊。有哪位虫友投过的能把word模板发给我参考一下嘛
已经有3人回复
reader1717
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 3329.4
- 帖子: 304
- 在线: 26.9小时
- 虫号: 186070
- 注册: 2006-02-15
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 预防医学其他科学问题