| 查看: 4824 | 回复: 6 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
回复审稿意见前的客套话
|
|||
| 一般在回复英文文章审稿意见时，在给出回复内容前都会 加一句 客气话，比如 thank you for you suggestion 等等。谁能给几个较好点例句 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
能否退出参与的面上项目解除限项
已经有18人回复
-
如果此刻你正在为国基感到焦虑，不妨来听听这首《基金之外》
已经有3人回复
-
今日不放榜？网传国自然预计 8 月 27 日可查结果
已经有21人回复
-
估计是周四
已经有4人回复
-
我面上完蛋了
已经有9人回复
-
2026国自然函评费到账
已经有18人回复
-
建议基金发布提前给出明确的时间点
已经有15人回复
-
范进中举一文的中心思想
已经有7人回复
-
朋友圈看到的
已经有9人回复
-
让我中一个面上吧！
已经有16人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- J. power sources 审稿意见
已经有7人回复
- 请问，这代表什么？求指教。投稿没送审就退了回来，JAP不收计算的文章吗？谢谢
已经有23人回复
- 这个审稿意见是什么意思啊，该怎么处理
已经有17人回复
- 投了大半年了，意见回来了不知后路如何
已经有11人回复
- 求助，编辑回复信意思
已经有8人回复
- 请虫虫们帮看看编辑的意思！！
已经有16人回复
- 审稿意见回复请教
已经有4人回复
- Applied Surface Science审稿意见 帮忙分析下 谢谢
已经有11人回复
WHQ197
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1821.8
- 散金: 105
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 339
- 在线: 75.3小时
- 虫号: 579876
- 注册: 2008-07-11
- 专业: 电磁环境与电磁兼容
330465277(金币+1): 2010-10-12 16:05:18
330465277(金币+1): 2011-01-24 18:39:59
330465277(金币+1): 2011-01-24 18:39:59
|
Dear Editors and Reviewers. We have tried our best to revise and improve the manuscript and made many changes in the manuscript according to the reviwers′good comments. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper. We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the corrections will meet with approval. Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions. We look forward to your information about my revised papers and thank you for your good comments. [ Last edited by WHQ197 on 2010-10-12 at 15:56 ] |
3楼2010-10-12 15:55:07
WHQ197
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1821.8
- 散金: 105
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 339
- 在线: 75.3小时
- 虫号: 579876
- 注册: 2008-07-11
- 专业: 电磁环境与电磁兼容
330465277(金币+1): 2010-10-12 15:55:20
330465277(金币+1): 2011-01-24 18:39:53
330465277(金币+1): 2011-01-24 18:39:53
|
Dear Editors and Reviewers. Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled "xxxx" (ID: xxx). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as following: |
2楼2010-10-12 15:48:51
4楼2010-10-12 16:06:27
5楼2010-10-12 19:44:11
