| 查看: 1773 | 回复: 20 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
请大家帮我看看编辑的回信 已有3人参与
|
|||
|
小弟第一次投文章,对编辑的谦虚说法不是很理解,具体如下。从三个编辑的审稿情况来看,第一个认为小修,添加一幅图和修改 语法错误;第二个提出了11条修改建议;第三个就直接拒了,他认为很多需要详细讨论,希望把这篇文章变成两篇,,也就是相当于重写吧。 大家遇到类似的情况怎么处理?或者说你认为怎么处理这样的结果比较好。是选择其他期刊,还是考虑去按照要求去改文章?谢谢! Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Journal of XXX. I have now received 3 reviews of your manuscript. I am sorry to inform you that based on the reviews of your manuscript, I have decided to decline it for publication inXXX at this time. While the manuscript is not acceptable now, with additional work, as outlined in the comments, I believe that you will be able to turn this into a more suitable paper. I am rejecting it now so as not to put a time constraint on your revision and allow you ample time to complete the additional work. Once the revisions are complete, I would like to encourage you to resubmit the paper, perhaps as more than one manuscript as suggested by reviewer 3. If you resubmit this paper, please note that you will need to send a point-by-point response to all reviewer remarks as well as a "tracked-changes" (changes highlighted or otherwise noted) version of your manuscript. Your revised manuscript will be treated as a new submission. Sincerely, [ Last edited by digua88 on 2010-10-7 at 16:17 ] |
» 猜你喜欢
2025年遐想
已经有5人回复
论文终于录用啦!满足毕业条件了
已经有12人回复
投稿Elsevier的杂志(返修),总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
求个博导看看
已经有18人回复
16楼2010-10-07 21:37:39
titoly
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 13845.3
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 1386
- 在线: 216.5小时
- 虫号: 875659
- 注册: 2009-10-17
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 海洋工程

2楼2010-10-07 16:33:36
3楼2010-10-07 16:47:55
visitor958
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
IEEE杂志与会议专家
- 应助: 2283 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.05
- 金币: 17310
- 散金: 2544
- 红花: 76
- 帖子: 15735
- 在线: 2926.6小时
- 虫号: 489254
- 注册: 2008-01-01
- 专业: IEEE
4楼2010-10-07 19:37:33







回复此楼