| 查看: 1919 | 回复: 14 | |||
| 本帖产生 1 个 ESEPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
xuediandongxi铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
|
[交流]
【Discussion】what is the standard for evaluating a post
|
||
|
I am wondering if there is a strict standard system for grading when our posts are evaluated by moderators. Which kind of posts can not be given gold coins? Maybe the number of the words in the post determines the number of the gold coins you can obtain. If so, how many words on earth are the creterion for different grades? Of course, sometimes moderator may do not fully follow these rules which even if have been already made. You know, for some newcomers, moderators must protect their enthusiasm for visiting 'English Cafe' and saying something. In this case, moderators perhaps are allowed to give much more gold coins than usual. In addition, how to encourage people to participate the special activity called Weekly Topic? Does this activity equal to orther activities which are initiated by non-moderator people? Is there a time limitation for a weekly topic? Do you have other measures to attract more friends to 'English cafe'? |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
孩子确诊有中度注意力缺陷
已经有13人回复
-
三甲基碘化亚砜的氧化反应
已经有4人回复
-
请问下大家为什么这个铃木偶联几乎不反应呢
已经有5人回复
-
请问有评职称，把科研教学业绩算分排序的高校吗
已经有5人回复
-
2025冷门绝学什么时候出结果
已经有3人回复
-
天津工业大学郑柳春团队欢迎化学化工、高分子化学或有机合成方向的博士生和硕士生加入
已经有4人回复
-
康复大学泰山学者周祺惠团队招收博士研究生
已经有6人回复
-
AI论文写作工具：是科研加速器还是学术作弊器？
已经有3人回复
-
论文投稿，期刊推荐
已经有4人回复
-
硕士和导师闹得不愉快
已经有13人回复
