24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

munich

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 3 (幼儿园)
金币: 1004.2
散金: 40
红花: 2
帖子: 357
在线: 260.6小时
虫号: 721583
注册: 2009-03-13
专业: 食品科学基础

[交流] science of the total environment被拒稿的感想已有12人参与

两个审稿专家的意见，一个就提出了几条语法错误，另一个提出了几条major comments。总的来看，几条major comments也是有修改的余地的，不是致命的缺陷，最后的结果还是在编辑手里悲剧了。编辑的信里说，该杂志的竞争比较激烈，他们只考虑有创新性的研究。由于稿件量大，即使是没有什么大问题的文章，也很难在该杂志上发表。

回复此楼

» 本帖已获得的红花（最新10朵）

wangyn2010

» 猜你喜欢

上海工程技术大学【激光智能制造】课题组招收硕士已经有6人回复
带资进组求博导收留已经有11人回复
自荐读博已经有5人回复
求个博导看看已经有16人回复
上海工程技术大学张培磊教授团队招收博士生已经有4人回复
求助院士们，这个如何合成呀已经有4人回复
临港实验室与上科大联培博士招生1名已经有9人回复
写了一篇“相变储能技术在冷库中应用”的论文，论文内容以实验为主，投什么期刊合适？已经有6人回复
最近几年招的学生写论文不引自己组发的文章已经有11人回复
中科院杭州医学所招收博士生一名（生物分析化学、药物递送）已经有3人回复

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

science of the total environment 期刊奇怪的投稿状态已经有3人回复
投稿经验International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 已经有6人回复
投Journal of applied polymer science被拒了改完还能重投这个杂志吗已经有7人回复
投稿Science of the Total Environment 已经有7人回复
Science of the Total Environment 投稿状态已经有4人回复
求助--投过science of the total environment 的前辈帮忙看一下，谢谢已经有7人回复
Science of the total environment审稿期有六个月么？已经有8人回复
science of the total environment 已审稿3个月，该不该写催稿信已经有9人回复
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture文章还在等结果已经有9人回复
有了解Science of the Total Environment这个杂志的吗已经有11人回复
有谁投过science of the total environment？已经有7人回复
有投过science of the total environment吗？已经有16人回复

1楼 2010-09-16 11:10:30

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

zhj3450

银虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 139
散金: 745
红花: 2
帖子: 122
在线: 43.8小时
虫号: 870463
注册: 2009-10-13
性别: GG
专业: 化学环境污染与健康

★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流

看来，我比你幸运，直接被拒稿！

We thank you for submitting your paper to STOTEN. After careful internal editorial review, we regret to inform you that we have decided not to pursue further peer review of your manuscript. In reaching this decision, we have been guided by several factors including fit within the scope of the journal, balance among topics covered, novelty of the study, originality of methodology or interpretation model, whether the data collection is scientifically driven, adequacy of grammatical presentation, and interest to our readers and the general public. The potential to enhance the knowledge base needed to improve the quality of our environment and human health through research, policy, management, and education remains the over-riding factor in considering articles for publication.

No editorial comments are available for papers that are not sent for external peer review.

A primary reason for rejection is that we lack sufficient Journal space to publish all of the outstanding papers that are submitted. We receive more 2000 manuscripts per year and our rejection rate currently stands at over 70%. The policy of screening manuscripts is further mandated by available editorial resources which limit the number of submitted papers that can be sent for peer review each week.

We see this policy as being both ethical and fair to authors who wish to submit elsewhere without undue delay. Our electronic system for managing manuscripts allows us to implement efficient screening and prompt turnaround times, sometimes in less than 24 hours. We receive many solid and interesting papers that we must turn down, and we wish you success in publishing elsewhere.

In spite of the unfavorable outcome for this particular manuscript, we trust that you will continue to support the journal in future.

Sincerely

[ Last edited by zhj3450 on 2010-9-21 at 17:58 ]