| 查看: 2757 | 回复: 46 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
【讨论】同志们 要学好英语啊！！！已有40人参与
|
|||
|
看看 是怎么悲剧的啊 这二审 还是。。。。 Reviewer : The science of the paper is generally ok and it is as such recommended for publication. Yet the manuscript, in my opinion, cannot be published as such due to substantial shortcomings in language and expression. I am not sure how to deal with it, because the authors obviously tried their best, but parts of the present manuscript are not readable as they are and others of poor language quality, which I would prefer not to see in CPL. As a referee, however, I cannot provide the numerous, often minor corrections/changes in language required. As far as I know, Elsevier offers a language polishing service, which might be the best solution. If the editor is convinced that in a revised version the language is appropriately corrected, no re-review is required. In any case, a professional language polishing would be most desirable. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
招贤纳博（已结束）
已经有28人回复
-
表征测试机构后台私聊我
已经有0人回复
-
物理化学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有60人回复
-
Coordination Chemistry Reviews
已经有0人回复
40楼2010-09-11 10:30:28
2楼2010-09-08 09:11:03
zhangmt
至尊木虫 (著名写手)
我叫MT
- QC强帖: 5
- 应助: 99 (初中生)
- 金币: 6961.8
- 散金: 10406
- 红花: 49
- 帖子: 1761
- 在线: 763.2小时
- 虫号: 880392
- 注册: 2009-10-22
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 理论和计算化学
3楼2010-09-08 09:22:32
4楼2010-09-08 09:35:01