| 查看: 2768 | 回复: 46 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
【讨论】同志们 要学好英语啊！！！已有40人参与
|
|||
|
看看 是怎么悲剧的啊 这二审 还是。。。。 Reviewer : The science of the paper is generally ok and it is as such recommended for publication. Yet the manuscript, in my opinion, cannot be published as such due to substantial shortcomings in language and expression. I am not sure how to deal with it, because the authors obviously tried their best, but parts of the present manuscript are not readable as they are and others of poor language quality, which I would prefer not to see in CPL. As a referee, however, I cannot provide the numerous, often minor corrections/changes in language required. As far as I know, Elsevier offers a language polishing service, which might be the best solution. If the editor is convinced that in a revised version the language is appropriately corrected, no re-review is required. In any case, a professional language polishing would be most desirable. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
ELISA试验中不容忽视的细节盘点(二)
已经有0人回复
-
国内青年破解费曼难题，从分子层面阐释液体蒸发（气液相变）微观过程
已经有5人回复
-
物理化学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有281人回复
-
研究发现一个新的临界系数，独立于临界压缩因子
已经有7人回复
-
200年来人们一直无法破解的难题： 气液临界点状态方程
已经有7人回复
-
细胞培养，这22个细节一定要注意！（一）
已经有0人回复
-
关于引力延迟下双星系统角动量不守恒的疑惑---求高手解答！
已经有10人回复
-
CSC访学博后项目获批，外方学校暂停合作该怎么办？
已经有51人回复
37楼2010-09-11 10:16:09
2楼2010-09-08 09:11:03
zhangmt
至尊木虫 (著名写手)
我叫MT
- QC强帖: 5
- 应助: 99 (初中生)
- 金币: 6961.8
- 散金: 10406
- 红花: 49
- 帖子: 1761
- 在线: 763.2小时
- 虫号: 880392
- 注册: 2009-10-22
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 理论和计算化学
3楼2010-09-08 09:22:32
4楼2010-09-08 09:35:01