24小时热门版块排行榜

南方科技大学公共卫生及应急管理学院2025级博士研究生招生报考通知

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

3867826

木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 159.4
散金: 1500
红花: 2
帖子: 1441
在线: 402.1小时
虫号: 715165
注册: 2009-03-05
性别: GG
专业: 理论和计算化学

[交流] 【讨论】同志们要学好英语啊！！！已有40人参与

看看是怎么悲剧的啊这二审还是。。。。
Reviewer : The science of the paper is generally ok and it is as such recommended for publication. Yet the manuscript, in my opinion, cannot be published as such due to substantial shortcomings in language and expression. I am not sure how to deal with it, because the authors obviously tried their best, but parts of the present manuscript are not readable as they are and others of poor language quality, which I would prefer not to see in CPL. As a referee, however, I cannot provide the numerous, often minor corrections/changes in language required. As far as I know, Elsevier offers a language polishing service, which might be the best solution. If the editor is convinced that in a revised version the language is appropriately corrected, no re-review is required. In any case, a professional language polishing would be most desirable.

回复此楼