[½»Á÷] ¾ÜÐÅÈçÏ ÒÑÓÐ9È˲ÎÓë

ÈçÏ¡£ Dear ¡Á¡Á¡Á: I write you in regards to manuscript # ¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á" which you submitted to the ¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á In view of the criticisms of the reviewer(s) found at the bottom of this letter, your manuscript has been denied publication in the ¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á Thank you for considering the ¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Áfor the publication of your research. I hope the outcome of this specific submission will not discourage you from the submission of future manuscripts. Sincerely, Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: The originality of the present work is not high. The materials were already reported. It is not clear what is new and what is already reported. The characterization of the product  is not enough. There are some mistakes in English (grammer and typo). Some important papers are missed in the references. As a result, this reviewer feels that the present paper would not be suitable for publication in ¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á һͶ±»¾Ü£¬ÔÙͶ±»¾Ü£¬ËãÏÂÀ´¡£ÒѾ­4¸ö¶àÔ¹ýÈ¥ÁË¡£

»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥

» ÊÕ¼±¾ÌûµÄÌÔÌûר¼­ÍƼö

decision in progress

» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶

• 260Çóµ÷¼Á ÒѾ­ÓÐ5È˻ظ´
• ¼±Ðèµ÷¼Á ÒѾ­ÓÐ10È˻ظ´
• É격/¿¼²© ÒѾ­ÓÐ4È˻ظ´
• »¯¹¤Ñ§Ë¶294·Ö£¬Çóµ¼Ê¦ÊÕÁô ÒѾ­ÓÐ37È˻ظ´
• Çóµ÷¼Á ÒѾ­ÓÐ11È˻ظ´
• Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÖÐÅ©Òµ071010£¬320Çóµ÷¼Á ÒѾ­ÓÐ19È˻ظ´
• 304Çóµ÷¼Á ÒѾ­ÓÐ7È˻ظ´
• Ç󲩵¼£üÉúÎïÖÊ»ù¶à¿×̼/³¬¼¶µçÈÝ·½Ïò£¬ÒÑÓÐÏà¹Ø³É¹û£¬Ñ°ÄÜÔ´²ÄÁÏ/̼²ÄÁÏ·½ÏòÀÏʦ ÒѾ­ÓÐ3È˻ظ´
• ¶þ±½¼×ͪËáÀàÑÜÉúÎï ÒѾ­ÓÐ6È˻ظ´
• ½ÓÊÜÈκε÷¼Á ÒѾ­ÓÐ4È˻ظ´

¸ß¼¶»Ø¸´