24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

zlh800522

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

SEPI: 2
应助: 6 (幼儿园)
贵宾: 0.006
金币: 15922.9
散金: 2304
红花: 3
帖子: 8953
在线: 602.5小时
虫号: 96150
注册: 2005-11-06
性别: MM
专业: 有机合成

[交流] 请同行把关一下已有9人参与

本人第一次给人审稿，不确定自己给出的审稿意见是否表达清楚，请大家给提提意见吧。另外，审稿意见的篇幅是否合适？谢谢！
补充：这篇论文不是国人的，里边几乎没有讨论，只是单纯的介绍自己的结果是多少，跟别人比较是高了还是低了，却不解释为什么会这样，没有深度可言；语法错误连篇，根本没法看；一点都不认真，很多括号都是一半是圆的，一半是方的；在国内，估计也就是三流刊物的水平。
This article is rejected for publication consideration for the following reasons.
1. It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone who is well-versed in English or whose native language is English. You should pay particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the results of the study are clear to the reader. I have no desire to edit the grammar of the text so it is not included in the review.
2. In the introduction section, the authors don’t provide a rationale for performing the study. In order to clearly define the purpose of the study, a hypothesis needs to be presented.
3. The results and discussion section is lengthy but without in depth discussion. That is to say, the authors introduce so many about results and compare with other studies, but seldom explain what the results indicate.
4. Some references are not mentioned that should be noted in the article. In addition, some of the references lists don’t follow the format for the journal.
5. I suggest that table 1 be divided into two tables. The figure legends don’t provide a clear explanation that allows the figures and graphs to be understood without referring to the remainder of the manuscript. For example, maybe many readers don’t understand what “30 d” and “90 d” represent in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2.

[ Last edited by zlh800522 on 2010-8-20 at 11:12 ]

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

如果你的面前有阴影，别怕，那是因为你的背后有阳光。

1楼 2010-08-20 09:32:40

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

polestar007

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
贵宾: 0.42
金币: 17388.8
红花: 5
帖子: 3952
在线: 1099.4小时
虫号: 439293
注册: 2007-10-10
专业: 胶体与界面化学

★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流

manuscript 而不是 article

第一条简单说明语言问题即可，太罗嗦，最后一句明显多余
第二条表述也不行，不要有 a hypothesis needs to be presented这种东西
第三条，也是说明讨论深度不够即可，that is to say，这种也不要
第四条，最好给出几篇文献供人家参考
第五条，30 d这种问题就不要说了，很弱，呵呵

总体来说，楼主的语言还得提炼一下，有些问题还是具体点好