24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

ffn

木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 918.2
散金: 1243
红花: 3
帖子: 349
在线: 176.2小时
虫号: 404952
注册: 2007-06-17
性别: GG
专业: 应用高分子化学与物理

[交流] 这种情况能不能argue啊，请高人赐教！

各位虫友，最近投一篇文章，两个审稿人给出意见，一个评论不是很好，但也没直接拒掉，另外一个审稿人同意接收但要修改，但是最后主编直接把我们拒了，大家帮忙看一下，能argue吗?如果可以，大家能介绍一下argue流程吗，能给个模板吗？谢谢大家了！金币答谢~！
Dear Prof. ****
We have appreciated the opportunity to consider your paper for publication.

Your manuscript has been examined by 2 independent referees and their comments are enclosed. Based on these comments, your manuscript is not ready for publication and that more work is clearly needed.

I regret that we are therefore unable to accept your paper for publication in *****.

Yours sincerely,
*******

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: The prepared method of bimetallic nanomaterials in this manuscript is doubtlessly of certain interest. But many points should be added and some statements require justification before further consideration.

1. The article is poorly-organized and need to be improved.
2. Whether the method can be used to other system?
3. The prepared Pd-Au NPs does not show a prominent advantage on the catalytic activity to ethanol compared with that of the reported.

Reviewer #2: The work deserves a rapid publication. However, I ask the authors to carefully take into account the following remarks:
1) Have the authors prepared other bimetallic NPs with different ratios (Pd/Au), and is there any difference in catalytic activity? Have the authors taken into account that palladium and gold precursors were added into the dispersive phase of the microemulsion simultaneously to prepare bimetallic materials? And do the resultant bimetallic materials have any difference from the previous Pd4Au NPs?
2) The authors should calculate the values of If /Ib on the Pd/CNTs and Pd4Au/CNTs.
3) Some minor corrections: "carbon tubes" is better indicated as "carbon nanotubes" in Abstract. "bimetallic" should be substituted with "bimetal" in Keywords. I suggest the authors to polish the paper by a native English speaker.

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

博士读完未来一定会好吗已经有15人回复
心脉受损已经有4人回复
Springer期刊投稿求助已经有4人回复
读博已经有3人回复
小论文投稿已经有3人回复
Bioresource Technology期刊，第一次返修的时候被退回好几次了已经有9人回复
到新单位后，换了新的研究方向，没有团队，持续积累2区以上论文，能申请到面上吗已经有8人回复
申请2026年博士已经有6人回复
请问哪里可以有青B申请的本子可以借鉴一下。已经有5人回复

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

苯环上的烷基取代。求高人指点。谢谢！已经有23人回复
除掉反应生成的乙醇，拉动反应平衡。求高人指点已经有15人回复
不知怎样选择请有经验的人赐教已经有22人回复
博后申请：这种情况该怎么办？已经有12人回复
请高人指点河南中烟工业有限责任公司的薪酬福利已经有15人回复
固化温度在300℃的耐高温热固性树脂的成型问题（模具）~~请大家不吝赐教~~ 已经有25人回复
argue信发出1周，无反应无回复。是否代表已经申诉失败？已经有17人回复
文章悲剧，能argue吗？已经有31人回复
哪位高人推荐本简单易懂的心理学书已经有39人回复
这种情况，是否需要回信？已经有6人回复
怎么才能知道能不能做一种药品呢（在中国）已经有3人回复
请问这样的情况需不需要argue？已经有11人回复

1楼2010-08-18 18:43:09

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

wzz525

木虫 (著名写手)

SEPI: 1
应助: 23 (小学生)
金币: 12532.9
散金: 2936
红花: 66
帖子: 1526
在线: 851小时
虫号: 841717
注册: 2009-09-06
性别: GG
专业: 固体力学

ffn(金币+2): 2010-08-18 23:02:25
ffn(金币+1): 2010-09-20 17:32:15

引用回帖:

Originally posted by ffn at 2010-08-18 18:43:09:
各位虫友，最近投一篇文章，两个审稿人给出意见，一个评论不是很好，但也没直接拒掉，另外一个审稿人同意接收但要修改，但是最后主编直接把我们拒了，大家帮忙看一下，能argue吗?如果可以，大家能介绍一下argue流 ...

编辑的意思也没有那么绝对的拒绝吧，只是当前版本不能发表。意见如果容易修改的话，按照意见修改后重投应该很有希望的。个人感觉argue成功的例子不多。