24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2119  |  回复: 21
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

jhzhuwanglj

银虫 (小有名气)

[交流] JAP被拒,还有修改重投的必要吗? 已有12人参与

审稿人的意见如下:

Reviewer Comments:
Reviewer #1 Evaluations:
RECOMMENDATION: Reject
Sufficient New Physics in an Applied Area: No
Appropriate Length: Yes
Well Organized and Clearly Written: Yes
Good Title: Yes
Good Abstract: Yes
Clear Figures: No
Adequate References: Yes
TECHNICAL QUALITY RATING: Marginal
PRESENTATION RATING: Good

Reviewer #1 (Comments to the Author):

This reviewer believes the submitted manuscript is not suitable for
publication in JAP for the following reasons.

1) Many of the structures studied in the manuscript are of size scale
comparable to wavelength and thus geometric optics based approach
such as ray tracing is fundamentally flawed.

2) Some ray tracing programs indeed incorporate diffraction but the purpose
is mostly to provide a correction to geometric optics and its valid for periodic
nanoscructures really needs to be verified. There is no such verification
effort in the manuscript.

3) For larger microstructures where geometric optics is valid, JAP
is not a suitable journal for geometric optical design issues.

The following comments might help redirect the research and
future submissions.

It would be a nice project to calibrate the transmission/reflection
model of a ray tracing (RT) program against more advanced
approach such as FDTD for a flat LED surface with nanostructure.
Then, the RT would be a suitable tool to study
extraction characteristics such as 3D angular distribution of
nanostructured LED. Such results would make a nice submission to
JAP or an engineering oriented journal.

大家看看还有修改重投的必要吗?还是改投呢?
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

随心所欲顺其自然
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

screw

木虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
编辑的意见是什么?
22楼2010-08-15 12:45:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 22 个回答

polestar007

至尊木虫 (职业作家)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
首先,被拒了就不要想着重投,除非你有新的重大发现

其次,有明确说明”not suitable for publication in JAP“
匏土革,木石金。丝与竹,乃八音。
2楼2010-08-14 10:15:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jhzhuwanglj

银虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by polestar007 at 2010-08-14 10:15:36:
首先,被拒了就不要想着重投,除非你有新的重大发现

其次,有明确说明”not suitable for publication in JAP“

嗯,主要是看审稿人其他指标的评价还不错!
随心所欲顺其自然
3楼2010-08-14 10:24:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

felicity6056

至尊木虫 (知名作家)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
改投吧,何苦浪费自己的时间涅
努力的过程讲究方法!
4楼2010-08-14 10:26:16
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 一志愿天大材料与化工(085600)总分338 +4 蔡大美女 2026-03-13 4/200 2026-03-18 22:47 by walc
[考研] 求材料调剂 +8 隔壁陈先生 2026-03-12 8/400 2026-03-18 22:19 by li123456789.
[考研] 一志愿985,本科211,0817化学工程与技术319求调剂 +7 Liwangman 2026-03-15 7/350 2026-03-18 20:08 by walc
[考研] 26调剂/材料/英一数二/总分289/已过A区线 +7 步川酷紫123 2026-03-13 7/350 2026-03-18 17:12 by 尽舜尧1
[考研] 0854可跨调剂,一作一项核心论文五项专利,省、国级证书40+数一英一287 +8 小李0854 2026-03-16 8/400 2026-03-18 14:35 by 搏击518
[考研] 288求调剂,一志愿华南理工大学071005 +4 ioodiiij 2026-03-17 4/200 2026-03-18 12:36 by Linda Hu
[考博] 环境领域全国重点实验室招收博士1-2名 +3 QGZDSYS 2026-03-13 5/250 2026-03-18 11:13 by QGZDSYS
[考研] 0703化学求调剂 总分331 +3 ZY-05 2026-03-13 3/150 2026-03-18 10:58 by macy2011
[考研] 307求调剂 +3 冷笙123 2026-03-17 3/150 2026-03-18 09:55 by macy2011
[考研] 332求调剂 +6 Zz版 2026-03-13 6/300 2026-03-17 17:03 by ruiyingmiao
[考研] 梁成伟老师课题组欢迎你的加入 +8 一鸭鸭哟 2026-03-14 10/500 2026-03-17 15:07 by 一鸭鸭哟
[考研] 一志愿,福州大学材料专硕339分求调剂 +3 木子momo青争 2026-03-15 3/150 2026-03-17 07:52 by laoshidan
[考研] 304求调剂 +5 素年祭语 2026-03-15 5/250 2026-03-16 17:00 by 我的船我的海
[考研] 277材料科学与工程080500求调剂 +3 自由煎饼果子 2026-03-16 3/150 2026-03-16 14:10 by 运气yunqi
[考研] 265求调剂 +4 威化饼07 2026-03-12 4/200 2026-03-14 17:23 by userper
[考研] 266求调剂 +4 学员97LZgn 2026-03-13 4/200 2026-03-14 08:37 by zhukairuo
[考研] 求材料调剂 085600英一数二总分302 前三科235 精通机器学习 一志愿哈工大 +4 林yaxin 2026-03-12 4/200 2026-03-13 22:04 by 星空星月
[考研] 材料专硕350 求调剂 +4 王金科 2026-03-12 4/200 2026-03-13 16:02 by ruiyingmiao
[考研] 土木第一志愿276求调剂,科研和技能十分丰富,求新兴方向的导师收留 +3 土木小天才 2026-03-12 3/150 2026-03-13 15:01 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 0817化学工程与技术考研312分调剂 +3 T123 tt 2026-03-12 3/150 2026-03-13 10:49 by houyaoxu
信息提示
请填处理意见