24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1923  |  回复: 3

尘谖

金虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 关于ISMST2010会议的拒稿意见 已有3人参与

8号收到了拒稿信,给大家看看审稿意见,另人有些哭笑不得,真不知道录用的是不是都是直接接受的。
第一个审稿意见
A. Style and Organization:
1. Is the paper clearly presented and well organized? y
2. Is the English satisfactory? y
3. Is the title appropriate? y
4. Are the figures, tables, and their captions clear? y
5. Are the references to related work adequate? y
B. Scientific Quality (Please check appropriate box):
q Contains significant contributions to the advancement of the subject.
q Sound, original, and of interest.
q Does not add to knowledge of the subject.
q Contains fundamental errors.
C. Recommendation (Please check appropriate box):
q Publish as it is.
q Publish with minor revision noted in evaluation statement.
q Publish with major revision.
q Reject.
第二个审稿意见
Comparing with the mechanical modeling and electromagnetic modeling method, this paper presents
an effective electromechanical coupling method to compute the power dissipation and quality factor
with random rough surface. The concept is reasonable, and provides some very useful data and
appropriate method for analyzing the micro/nano-scale conductors. Finally, from the technical point of
view, I think it is ready for publication. In addition, there are a few typos should be corrected before
submitting the whole article.
List of some typos:
1. In the abstract:” A numerical methods based on the finite element formulation and the skin effect
was proposed to computer……..” the “computer” should be “compute”.
2. “individually” in the sixth line should be “separately”
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

尘谖

金虫 (正式写手)

会议给的拒稿信上面说是根绝审稿人的意见拒稿的,可是我并没有看出来审稿人的意见是拒稿啊。
而且文章篇幅也是按照他们的规定写的。
还有一个明显的问题,他们使用的是作者推荐的审稿人,因为以往期刊都不使用作者推荐审稿人,所以我推荐的是本领域的专家,难道问题出在这里?作为专家,基本上不会给出直接接受的意见。
2楼2010-08-13 23:24:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

haiting_math

金虫 (著名写手)

不清楚 看看意见  改投吧
3楼2010-08-14 00:32:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

molh7299

金虫 (著名写手)

为什么还没有出版?

[ Last edited by molh7299 on 2010-11-23 at 08:51 ]
4楼2010-11-23 08:35:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 尘谖 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 2026国自然函评费到账 +16 羊腰板 2026-08-21 17/850 2026-08-23 23:02 by tianxiaochun
[基金申请] 2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战 +4 process2012 2026-08-23 5/250 2026-08-23 19:58 by jurkat.1640
[基金申请] 什么时候开奖? +9 CrisMessi 2026-08-18 10/500 2026-08-23 12:03 by 丶昵称占用
[基金申请] 范进中举一文的中心思想 +3 炎黄贵胄 2026-08-22 4/200 2026-08-22 20:02 by mycsru
[基金申请] 人气不行了 +8 fansofjerry 2026-08-21 8/400 2026-08-22 16:30 by zyqchem
[基金申请] 今天基金会出结果吗?20260819 +16 kkkl_v 2026-08-19 17/850 2026-08-22 16:12 by 阿布Abu
[基金申请] 时间戳今天,20号变了 +5 archvillain 2026-08-20 5/250 2026-08-22 06:12 by hui_daxiao
[基金申请] 放榜前的不淡定 40+4 snowwithsea 2026-08-19 14/700 2026-08-21 23:51 by cratir
[基金申请] 建议基金发布提前给出明确的时间点 +10 kulium 2026-08-21 13/650 2026-08-21 21:58 by alongwaytogo
[基金申请] 今日不放榜?网传国自然预计 8 月 27 日可查结果 +16 医学老男孩 2026-08-20 20/1000 2026-08-21 21:13 by Ldrop2023
[基金申请] 感觉是下周放榜了 +7 angus9576 2026-08-17 12/600 2026-08-21 13:38 by weiyin
[基金申请] 我面上完蛋了 +7 且听虎啸 2026-08-20 8/400 2026-08-21 12:31 by 酷酷墨镜
[基金申请] 应该是下周三26日公布了吧? +4 哈哈蛤? 2026-08-21 4/200 2026-08-21 10:58 by Vivilian
[论文投稿] 投稿咨询 +5 wwm09 2026-08-17 7/350 2026-08-21 10:11 by 期刊论文帮手
[基金申请] 今天放榜没戏了吧 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-19 11/550 2026-08-21 10:06 by gltch
[基金申请] 估计是周四 +3 archvillain 2026-08-18 3/150 2026-08-21 01:48 by jnhyjjm
[基金申请] 时间戳变了,能看出什么问题? +18 基诺咪客 2026-08-17 23/1150 2026-08-20 17:19 by Godzela
[基金申请] 重要消息,中午系统在维护 +11 yuleib84 2026-08-18 12/600 2026-08-20 11:09 by xskun
[基金申请] 朋友圈看到的 +6 wangzilk 2026-08-18 8/400 2026-08-19 10:55 by Haru815
[基金申请] 今天维护系统维护 祝所有人 高中 +8 gjjjzhong 2026-08-18 9/450 2026-08-18 13:01 by 家与远方
信息提示
请填处理意见