[交流] Biologia Plantarum审稿意见反馈，求助！！ 已有1人参与

Further remarks: The referee stated many objections against the manuscript. In addition, presentation of data is not very high, the text is not well written and the manuscript does not follow precisely “Notice to Contributors”. Therefore the paper cannot be accepted in the present form. We highly recommend publishing your paper in full length in local journal. If you decide to publish your results in Biologia Plantarum it is necessary: 1) to revise the paper according to all suggestions of the referee; 2) to combine Figs. 1 + 2 + 3 and 5 + 6; 3) to improve their quality considerable and arrange them precisely according to “Notice…”; 4) to rewrite and shorten the text to be more clear and concise; 6) to correct language by native English speaker familiar with the topic. 这是审稿意见最后的Further Remarks，本来返来的意见是大修，结果前面看来看去都是修改语法即可，所以一开始没在意，等送去了才注意到这一段 第一次投稿没经验 那个to rewrite and shorten the text to be more clear and concise; 看起来难道真的要重写吗？老板很火我没有一开始仔细看啊…… 其实我看到了但没往深处想…… 说到底还是我粗心了…… 已经送去改语法了，估计都快回来了~这个程度要怎么办呢……求有经验的同学指点~谢谢了！

回复此楼