| 查看: 1155 | 回复: 10 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
帮忙鉴定下，编辑什么意思 已有6人参与
|
|||
|
文章投了1个半月后，今天收到编辑的来信，如下： Dear Author, Your manuscript has been received. After a quick screening review, we found that the results as reported here cannot be considered for publication as an original research paper in this journal, ***. It is apparent that the research data presented in this manuscript are not original enough and are process-based analysis. Such information may be useful because of the few key parameters obtained. If you agree with this analysis, I propose this manuscript to be shortened to a Short Communication. 各位帮我鉴定下，我该怎么办呢？如果按编辑意见修改，接收的概率大吗？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
论文终于录用啦！满足毕业条件了
已经有10人回复
-
2025年遐想
已经有4人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的杂志（返修），总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
-
自然科学基金委宣布启动申请书“瘦身提质”行动
已经有4人回复
-
求个博导看看
已经有18人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 请大家帮忙看看编辑的回信
已经有1人回复
7楼2010-07-29 21:25:58