| 查看: 2677 | 回复: 26 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
水岩663铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
|
[交流]
这个据稿理由，大家看看我该怎么办？ 已有26人参与
|
|
|
昨天投的第一篇SCI历时三个多月，终于还是据稿了。原帖http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=2080307 第一个referee： "The results should be useful for a variety of research fields especially for epoxy resin and cured polymeric materials. Therefore, this paper is suitable for publication in "**********" only after clarifications mentioned below." 第二个referee： “From the point of view, I cannot find novelty and importance in the authors' article. I know the synthetic procedure is improved, but the investigation of curing and the LC behavior is overlapped with the work by ***. The authors of course have original data, so I think the authors reorganize this manuscript and strength the point of novelty and importance that the authors found out.” editor站在了第二个referee的立场，拒掉了。 我想问一下这种情况，一个要求小修一个以没有创新性为由据稿，我是可以修改修改再投原来的杂志，这样会不会不太合理？还是改改投另一个杂志了？ 真诚希望大家的建议  |
回复此楼
14楼2010-07-27 13:45:16
2楼2010-07-27 10:13:38
hewensen
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
suiyuan
- 应助: 17 (小学生)
- 金币: 7621.6
- 散金: 199
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 1794
- 在线: 155.4小时
- 虫号: 358073
- 注册: 2007-04-28
- 专业: 食品科学基础
3楼2010-07-27 10:17:40
hehongwei4103
铜虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 23.1
- 散金: 115
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 754
- 在线: 492.7小时
- 虫号: 453027
- 注册: 2007-11-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 聚合物共混与复合材料
4楼2010-07-27 10:46:43