[交流] 这个据稿理由，大家看看我该怎么办？ 已有26人参与

昨天投的第一篇SCI历时三个多月，终于还是据稿了。原帖http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=2080307 第一个referee： "The results should be useful for a variety of research fields especially for epoxy resin and cured polymeric materials. Therefore, this paper is suitable for publication in "**********" only after clarifications mentioned below." 第二个referee： “From the point of view, I cannot find novelty and importance in the authors' article. I know the synthetic procedure is improved, but the investigation of curing and the LC behavior is overlapped with the work by ***. The authors of course have original data, so I think the authors reorganize this manuscript and strength the point of novelty and importance that the authors found out.” editor站在了第二个referee的立场，拒掉了。 我想问一下这种情况，一个要求小修一个以没有创新性为由据稿，我是可以修改修改再投原来的杂志，这样会不会不太合理？还是改改投另一个杂志了？ 真诚希望大家的建议

回复此楼