24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 3096  |  回复: 16
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

jsnzf

银虫 (小有名气)

[交流] 投过Materials Letters的虫友,求助技术审查的修改!已有11人参与

投过Materials Letters一篇文章,听说最近拘稿率比较高,甚是担心被拒,投后一个礼拜后,技术审查着环节没有通过,以下是技术审查反馈的原文,有投过的虫友,给点参考意见呢。好象格式是没有问题了,就是第二点要求看不懂,还有请问上传修改稿还需要写个Technical_Check的修改说明吗?
青年感赐教!

Dear Mr ,

Thank you for submitting your work to Materials Letters.

Before we pass on manuscripts to the Journal Editor, who is responsible for the scientific assessment, we perform an initial check against formal technical criteria (structure of submission, adherence to the Guide for Authors and English language usage).

We regret to inform you that your manuscript has failed  the initial formal technical criteria assessment.

(1) USE OF ENGLISH

In its current state, the level of English throughout your manuscript does not meet the journal's required standard. Authors have the responsibility to present papers in good English which can be understood by the journal's readership. If reviewers cannot understand your work as easily as possible, the acceptance possibility of your article will be lowered greatly.

We will NOT consider a revised version of your manuscript, unless it has received a complete re-writing to improve the level of English.
(2) FINAL WORD

We welcome you to resubmit it, however, we will again check your manuscript for adherence to technical criteria. Passing this is not a guarantee that your submission will subsequently proceed to the peer review process, which is a decision to be made at the sole discretion of the Editor.

Yours sincerely,


Journal Manager
Materials Letters
回复此楼

» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

比翼

木虫 (小有名气)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
目前我的正在小修,专家评审较好,最初投递时也遇到了同样的问题,很多期刊都有格式审核,没什么问题,按照要求认真修改就好。
英文可以送到AJE去修改。
投回时不是重新投递,需要写修改说明。
祝好运!
6楼2010-07-24 11:45:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

比翼

木虫 (小有名气)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
引用回帖:
Originally posted by jsnzf at 2010-07-24 12:38:13:

请指教第二点,那个是什么要求啊,没有看懂。
(2) FINAL WORD

We welcome you to resubmit it, however, we will again check your manuscript for adherence to technical criteria. Passing this is not  ...

首先,期望你再将文章投递回去;
其次,文章将再次经过技术审核,并且,通过技术审核并不代表文章能够短期内接收等,这些不代表主编的意思。
这里,你所要区分的就是技术审核和主编意见的区别,技术审核仅仅是代表文章的格式,英文质量等方面的形式性问题,和文章将来能否接收等没有直接关系。
最主要的还是看你的文章能否吸引主编及评审专家。
祝你好运!
12楼2010-07-25 17:19:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 jsnzf 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见