24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2311  |  回复: 28

ab0345

金虫 (小有名气)

[交流] SCI 文章被居, 有点生气 已有25人参与

我刚刚收到一篇SCI 文章的审稿意见,意见如下,连修改的机会都不给,被剧,不服

Your Technical Paper, listed above, has completed the peer-review process for possible publicationXXXXXXXXXXXX The editor's final decision was to decline the manuscript.

You can view any reviewers' attachments by clicking on this link.  This link will only work one time.  Next time you will have to navigate to the attachments by viewing your manuscript submission:

For your guidance, you will find below the reviewer's comments identifying those elements of the manuscript that prevent its acceptance by the Journal.

We realize that it takes a great deal of time and effort to prepare a paper for submission and we thank you for choosingXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX for submission of your work

Sincerely,

Pamela Lucas Philpott
Editorial Coordinator

Reviewers' comments:

Both reviewers have some serious concerns about the paper and consider it to be below average.

Reviewer #1: The English language in the paper is of very poor quality. Throughout the manuscript, it is very difficult to fully understand what the authors want to say. The authors should find some assistance in rewriting the paper in acceptable English.

Nevertheless, I tried to understand the technical content. The topic of the paper is very interesting. Nevertheless, it seems to me that the authors do not realize that in their study, by changing the content of the coarse aggregate, they are also modifiying the paste content and paste properties. Looking at the grading curve of the fine aggregate, it can be noticed that 27.8 % is passing through the 0.15µm sieve. So, a substantial part of the fine aggregate is most probably smaller that 0.125µm, and thus can technically be considered as 'powder'. The modification of the paste properties and the paste content probably is much more relevant to the investigated material properties than the content of coarse aggregate. The authors should re-analyse their result taking this into account.



Reviewer #2: This manuscript describes the results of the effect of coarse effect on properties of SCC. It may become publishable if the authors can revise it properly:

(1) The materials were from China, and the research work was done in China, some experiments followed Chinese standards, how and why the cement was analyzed following  Turkish Standard EN TS 196-2, and the slump flow was determined following GOST 1018100 (Soviet and Russian government standard)?
(2) How could the aggregate have a porosity of 43%? How was it measured?
(3) When SCC mixtures have slump greater than 750 mm, and contain so much coarse aggregate, the mixtures will bleed and segregate.

(4) It is surprised that a such small variation in coarse aggregate content would result such significant effect on the properties of concrete if there was no bleeding and segregation. Or pls provide explanations how the coarse aggregate content affect the properties of concrete.
(5) Pls use mass instead of weight.
(6) The whole manuscript needs improvements
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家

冷静,很正常。。。修改重投或改投。
2楼2010-07-01 20:44:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

JluChem

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
按照审稿意见好好修改
然后重投或改投 一定能中的
楼主不要灰心 好运
3楼2010-07-01 20:55:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jianjun33

木虫 (小有名气)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
淡定淡定~~~修改后改投
4楼2010-07-01 21:00:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ab0345

金虫 (小有名气)

我最近还有三篇在等决定,上帝呀保佑我把
5楼2010-07-01 21:11:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ab0345

金虫 (小有名气)

对了,大家说说以上这样的审稿意见,其他期刊是不是要给修改的机会???
6楼2010-07-01 21:13:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
好一点的杂志,很难。没关系,就是要好好修改。
引用回帖:
Originally posted by ab0345 at 2010-07-01 21:13:04:
对了,大家说说以上这样的审稿意见,其他期刊是不是要给修改的机会???

7楼2010-07-01 21:18:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

troy581

木虫 (正式写手)

投稿被拒要淡定!
8楼2010-07-01 21:25:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jssunyz

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

慢慢来呀,谁都有过被拒的经历的~~~~
9楼2010-07-01 21:30:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wujiaqi

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
按照审稿意见好好修改
10楼2010-07-01 21:32:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 ab0345 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 274求调剂 +3 cgyzqwn 2026-03-01 6/300 2026-03-01 21:24 by cgyzqwn
[考研] 299求调剂 +3 Y墨明棋妙Y 2026-02-28 5/250 2026-03-01 21:01 by tangxiaotian
[考研] 306分材料调剂 +4 chuanzhu川烛 2026-03-01 5/250 2026-03-01 19:48 by 无际的草原
[考研] 化工299分求调剂 一志愿985落榜 +5 嘻嘻(*^ω^*) 2026-03-01 5/250 2026-03-01 19:47 by 无际的草原
[考研] 材料学硕318求调剂 +9 February_Feb 2026-03-01 11/550 2026-03-01 19:47 by 无懈可击111
[考研] 265分求调剂不调专业和学校有行学上就 +5 礼堂丁真258 2026-02-28 7/350 2026-03-01 19:12 by Js512888
[考研] 一志愿中南大学理学化学 +4 15779376950 2026-03-01 5/250 2026-03-01 19:00 by Fff-1
[考研] 272求调剂 +6 材紫有化 2026-02-28 6/300 2026-03-01 18:58 by 18137688336
[考研] 材料类求调剂 +10 wana_kiko 2026-02-28 11/550 2026-03-01 18:11 by 海嵙Y
[考研] 化工专硕348,一志愿985求调剂 +5 弗格个 2026-02-28 8/400 2026-03-01 17:25 by sunny81
[考研] 0856求调剂285 +8 吕仔龙 2026-02-28 8/400 2026-03-01 17:25 by 刘兵
[考研] 281求调剂 +4 2026计算机_诚心 2026-03-01 7/350 2026-03-01 17:20 by 2026计算机_诚心
[基金申请] 刚录用,没有期刊号,但是在线可看的论文可以放为代表作吗 10+3 arang1 2026-03-01 3/150 2026-03-01 16:43 by babero
[考研] 307求调剂 +5 wyyyqx 2026-03-01 5/250 2026-03-01 15:21 by Fff-1
[考研] 304求调剂 +6 曼殊2266 2026-02-28 7/350 2026-03-01 15:14 by wjLi2017
[考研] 求调剂 +6 repeatt?t 2026-02-28 6/300 2026-03-01 14:37 by Sakura绘
[考研] 调剂 +3 简木ChuFront 2026-02-28 3/150 2026-03-01 11:46 by 王伟要上岸啊
[考研] 317一志愿华南理工电气工程求调剂 +6 Soliloquy_Q 2026-02-28 11/550 2026-03-01 11:14 by 歌liekkas
[硕博家园] 2025届双非化工硕士毕业,申博 +3 更多的是 2026-02-27 4/200 2026-03-01 10:04 by ztg729
[论文投稿] 求助coordination chemistry reviews 的写作模板 10+3 ljplijiapeng 2026-02-27 4/200 2026-03-01 09:07 by babero
信息提示
请填处理意见