24小时热门版块排行榜    

Znn3bq.jpeg
查看: 2376  |  回复: 28

ab0345

金虫 (小有名气)

[交流] SCI 文章被居, 有点生气 已有25人参与

我刚刚收到一篇SCI 文章的审稿意见,意见如下,连修改的机会都不给,被剧,不服

Your Technical Paper, listed above, has completed the peer-review process for possible publicationXXXXXXXXXXXX The editor's final decision was to decline the manuscript.

You can view any reviewers' attachments by clicking on this link.  This link will only work one time.  Next time you will have to navigate to the attachments by viewing your manuscript submission:

For your guidance, you will find below the reviewer's comments identifying those elements of the manuscript that prevent its acceptance by the Journal.

We realize that it takes a great deal of time and effort to prepare a paper for submission and we thank you for choosingXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX for submission of your work

Sincerely,

Pamela Lucas Philpott
Editorial Coordinator

Reviewers' comments:

Both reviewers have some serious concerns about the paper and consider it to be below average.

Reviewer #1: The English language in the paper is of very poor quality. Throughout the manuscript, it is very difficult to fully understand what the authors want to say. The authors should find some assistance in rewriting the paper in acceptable English.

Nevertheless, I tried to understand the technical content. The topic of the paper is very interesting. Nevertheless, it seems to me that the authors do not realize that in their study, by changing the content of the coarse aggregate, they are also modifiying the paste content and paste properties. Looking at the grading curve of the fine aggregate, it can be noticed that 27.8 % is passing through the 0.15µm sieve. So, a substantial part of the fine aggregate is most probably smaller that 0.125µm, and thus can technically be considered as 'powder'. The modification of the paste properties and the paste content probably is much more relevant to the investigated material properties than the content of coarse aggregate. The authors should re-analyse their result taking this into account.



Reviewer #2: This manuscript describes the results of the effect of coarse effect on properties of SCC. It may become publishable if the authors can revise it properly:

(1) The materials were from China, and the research work was done in China, some experiments followed Chinese standards, how and why the cement was analyzed following  Turkish Standard EN TS 196-2, and the slump flow was determined following GOST 1018100 (Soviet and Russian government standard)?
(2) How could the aggregate have a porosity of 43%? How was it measured?
(3) When SCC mixtures have slump greater than 750 mm, and contain so much coarse aggregate, the mixtures will bleed and segregate.

(4) It is surprised that a such small variation in coarse aggregate content would result such significant effect on the properties of concrete if there was no bleeding and segregation. Or pls provide explanations how the coarse aggregate content affect the properties of concrete.
(5) Pls use mass instead of weight.
(6) The whole manuscript needs improvements
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家

冷静,很正常。。。修改重投或改投。
2楼2010-07-01 20:44:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

JluChem

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
按照审稿意见好好修改
然后重投或改投 一定能中的
楼主不要灰心 好运
3楼2010-07-01 20:55:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jianjun33

木虫 (小有名气)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
淡定淡定~~~修改后改投
4楼2010-07-01 21:00:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ab0345

金虫 (小有名气)

我最近还有三篇在等决定,上帝呀保佑我把
5楼2010-07-01 21:11:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ab0345

金虫 (小有名气)

对了,大家说说以上这样的审稿意见,其他期刊是不是要给修改的机会???
6楼2010-07-01 21:13:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
好一点的杂志,很难。没关系,就是要好好修改。
引用回帖:
Originally posted by ab0345 at 2010-07-01 21:13:04:
对了,大家说说以上这样的审稿意见,其他期刊是不是要给修改的机会???

7楼2010-07-01 21:18:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

troy581

木虫 (正式写手)

投稿被拒要淡定!
8楼2010-07-01 21:25:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jssunyz

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

慢慢来呀,谁都有过被拒的经历的~~~~
9楼2010-07-01 21:30:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wujiaqi

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
按照审稿意见好好修改
10楼2010-07-01 21:32:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 ab0345 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 化工学硕294分,求导师收留 +33 yzyzx 2026-04-12 37/1850 2026-04-17 23:00 by wunaiy88
[考研] 260求调剂 +3 Zyt1314520.. 2026-04-17 4/200 2026-04-17 21:06 by Eurekall
[考研] 0854求调剂 +21 门路摸摸 2026-04-15 25/1250 2026-04-17 15:45 by qzxyhcsy
[考研] 322求调剂 +6 tekuzu 2026-04-17 6/300 2026-04-17 13:48 by Espannnnnol
[考研] 297,工科调剂? +4 河南农业大学-能 2026-04-14 4/200 2026-04-16 22:52 by wulijun2012
[考研] 289 分105500药学专硕求调剂(找B区学校) +4 白云123456789 2026-04-13 4/200 2026-04-16 00:18 by 粉沁若尘
[考研] 297工科调剂? +14 河南农业大学-能 2026-04-13 15/750 2026-04-15 13:25 by 黑科技矿业
[考研] 271求调剂 +35 2261744733 2026-04-11 41/2050 2026-04-14 15:36 by zs92450
[考研] 考研调剂 +13 长弓傲 2026-04-13 14/700 2026-04-14 14:44 by zs92450
[考研] 085408光电信息工程专硕355一志愿长春光机所调剂 +6 王ymaa 2026-04-13 13/650 2026-04-14 11:33 by 王ymaa
[考研] 305求调剂 +8 玛卡巴卡boom 2026-04-11 8/400 2026-04-14 09:04 by pengliang8036
[考研] 考研求调剂 +12 子木呐 2026-04-12 13/650 2026-04-14 01:19 by 王珺璞
[考研] 考研英一数一338分 +9 长江大学东校区 2026-04-13 10/500 2026-04-14 00:41 by 王珺璞
[考研] 2026硕士调剂_能动_河南农业大学 +4 河南农业大学-能 2026-04-12 4/200 2026-04-13 22:01 by bljnqdcc
[考研] 一志愿085802 323分求调剂 +13 drizzle_9 2026-04-12 14/700 2026-04-13 10:26 by Faiz5552
[考研] 一志愿浙大生物325分求调剂 +9 zysheng 2026-04-12 9/450 2026-04-12 22:31 by yuyin1233
[考研] 346分,工科0854求调剂,专硕 +6 moser233 2026-04-12 7/350 2026-04-12 22:11 by fqwang
[考研] 调剂结束 +6 floriea 2026-04-12 8/400 2026-04-12 18:13 by zhouxiaoyu
[考研] 359求调剂 +5 胃痉挛累了 2026-04-11 5/250 2026-04-11 19:55 by lbsjt
[考研] 283求调剂 086004考英二数二 +17 那个噜子 2026-04-10 18/900 2026-04-11 16:27 by 明月此时有
信息提示
请填处理意见