24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2315  |  回复: 28

ab0345

金虫 (小有名气)

[交流] SCI 文章被居, 有点生气 已有25人参与

我刚刚收到一篇SCI 文章的审稿意见,意见如下,连修改的机会都不给,被剧,不服

Your Technical Paper, listed above, has completed the peer-review process for possible publicationXXXXXXXXXXXX The editor's final decision was to decline the manuscript.

You can view any reviewers' attachments by clicking on this link.  This link will only work one time.  Next time you will have to navigate to the attachments by viewing your manuscript submission:

For your guidance, you will find below the reviewer's comments identifying those elements of the manuscript that prevent its acceptance by the Journal.

We realize that it takes a great deal of time and effort to prepare a paper for submission and we thank you for choosingXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX for submission of your work

Sincerely,

Pamela Lucas Philpott
Editorial Coordinator

Reviewers' comments:

Both reviewers have some serious concerns about the paper and consider it to be below average.

Reviewer #1: The English language in the paper is of very poor quality. Throughout the manuscript, it is very difficult to fully understand what the authors want to say. The authors should find some assistance in rewriting the paper in acceptable English.

Nevertheless, I tried to understand the technical content. The topic of the paper is very interesting. Nevertheless, it seems to me that the authors do not realize that in their study, by changing the content of the coarse aggregate, they are also modifiying the paste content and paste properties. Looking at the grading curve of the fine aggregate, it can be noticed that 27.8 % is passing through the 0.15µm sieve. So, a substantial part of the fine aggregate is most probably smaller that 0.125µm, and thus can technically be considered as 'powder'. The modification of the paste properties and the paste content probably is much more relevant to the investigated material properties than the content of coarse aggregate. The authors should re-analyse their result taking this into account.



Reviewer #2: This manuscript describes the results of the effect of coarse effect on properties of SCC. It may become publishable if the authors can revise it properly:

(1) The materials were from China, and the research work was done in China, some experiments followed Chinese standards, how and why the cement was analyzed following  Turkish Standard EN TS 196-2, and the slump flow was determined following GOST 1018100 (Soviet and Russian government standard)?
(2) How could the aggregate have a porosity of 43%? How was it measured?
(3) When SCC mixtures have slump greater than 750 mm, and contain so much coarse aggregate, the mixtures will bleed and segregate.

(4) It is surprised that a such small variation in coarse aggregate content would result such significant effect on the properties of concrete if there was no bleeding and segregation. Or pls provide explanations how the coarse aggregate content affect the properties of concrete.
(5) Pls use mass instead of weight.
(6) The whole manuscript needs improvements
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家

冷静,很正常。。。修改重投或改投。
2楼2010-07-01 20:44:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

JluChem

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
按照审稿意见好好修改
然后重投或改投 一定能中的
楼主不要灰心 好运
3楼2010-07-01 20:55:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jianjun33

木虫 (小有名气)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
淡定淡定~~~修改后改投
4楼2010-07-01 21:00:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ab0345

金虫 (小有名气)

我最近还有三篇在等决定,上帝呀保佑我把
5楼2010-07-01 21:11:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ab0345

金虫 (小有名气)

对了,大家说说以上这样的审稿意见,其他期刊是不是要给修改的机会???
6楼2010-07-01 21:13:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
好一点的杂志,很难。没关系,就是要好好修改。
引用回帖:
Originally posted by ab0345 at 2010-07-01 21:13:04:
对了,大家说说以上这样的审稿意见,其他期刊是不是要给修改的机会???

7楼2010-07-01 21:18:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

troy581

木虫 (正式写手)

投稿被拒要淡定!
8楼2010-07-01 21:25:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jssunyz

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

慢慢来呀,谁都有过被拒的经历的~~~~
9楼2010-07-01 21:30:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wujiaqi

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
按照审稿意见好好修改
10楼2010-07-01 21:32:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 ab0345 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 成果系统访问量大,请一小时后再尝试。---NSFC啥时候好哦,已经两天这样了 +4 NSFC2026我来了 2026-02-28 4/200 2026-03-01 22:37 by 铁门栓
[考研] 求调剂 +3 yunziaaaaa 2026-03-01 3/150 2026-03-01 21:45 by 王兆江
[考研] 274求调剂 +3 cgyzqwn 2026-03-01 6/300 2026-03-01 21:24 by cgyzqwn
[考研] 高分子化学与物理调剂 +6 好好好1233 2026-02-28 12/600 2026-03-01 19:48 by 好好好1233
[考研] 306分材料调剂 +4 chuanzhu川烛 2026-03-01 5/250 2026-03-01 19:48 by 无际的草原
[考研] 298求调剂 +6 axyz3 2026-02-28 6/300 2026-03-01 19:00 by 18137688336
[考研] 272求调剂 +6 材紫有化 2026-02-28 6/300 2026-03-01 18:58 by 18137688336
[考研] 0856材料求调剂 +11 hyf hyf hyf 2026-02-28 12/600 2026-03-01 18:57 by 18137688336
[考研] 291分工科求调剂 +9 science饿饿 2026-03-01 10/500 2026-03-01 18:55 by 18137688336
[考研] 295求调剂 +7 19171856320 2026-02-28 7/350 2026-03-01 18:54 by 18137688336
[考研] 材料学调剂 +9 提神豆沙包 2026-02-28 11/550 2026-03-01 18:15 by ms629
[考研] 321求调剂一志愿东北林业大学材料与化工英二数二 +4 虫虫虫虫虫7 2026-03-01 7/350 2026-03-01 16:52 by caszguilin
[考研] 化工专硕342,一志愿大连理工大学,求调剂 +3 kyf化工 2026-02-28 4/200 2026-03-01 16:49 by yywzz
[基金申请] 刚录用,没有期刊号,但是在线可看的论文可以放为代表作吗 10+3 arang1 2026-03-01 3/150 2026-03-01 16:43 by babero
[考研] 313求调剂 +3 水流年lc 2026-02-28 3/150 2026-03-01 16:01 by 新能源达人
[考研] 303求调剂 +4 今夏不夏 2026-03-01 4/200 2026-03-01 14:46 by 嘟嘟小浣熊
[考研] 求调剂 +6 repeatt?t 2026-02-28 6/300 2026-03-01 14:37 by Sakura绘
[考研] 295复试调剂 +3 简木ChuFront 2026-03-01 3/150 2026-03-01 14:27 by zzxw520th
[考研] 302材料工程求调剂 +4 Doleres 2026-03-01 5/250 2026-03-01 11:52 by liqiongjy
[硕博家园] 【博士招生】太原理工大学2026化工博士 +4 N1ce_try 2026-02-24 8/400 2026-02-26 08:40 by N1ce_try
信息提示
请填处理意见