| 查看: 5857 | 回复: 103 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
gdk199金虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
论文小修，今天接收了，再散40金币
|
||
|
今天文章终于接收了，感谢小木虫给我提供的一些写作信息，让我在写论文的过程中的学到了许多，文章接收总共耗时50天，个人觉得比较快，当然还有更牛的虫子半个月以内就接收的。还是感到很幸运，这是本人的第一篇外文，想起来还是觉得以前的辛酸值得的。 这是7号还没接收的时候发的 以下是主编给我的回信，主要是修改两个很小的地方，修改稿是6月3号上传的，4号with editor，过了周末，没变状态，希望今天能给我审一下，急切期待中，这两天查邮件都快疯了，希望广大虫子也为我祈福。还有，问一下，像我这种情况，一般还要审多久，有经验的虫子点拨一下。 Dear XXXXXXXX, The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed To submit your revision, please do the following: 1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/jmad/ 2. Enter your login details 3. Click [Author Login] This takes you to the Author Main Menu. 4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision] When submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word). Uploading only a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication. If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them. I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Yours sincerely, Reviewers' comments: Reviewer: The paper on the microstructural development in Mg alloy describes the age hardening as function of heat treatment for a total of 8 hours at three different temperatures. The paper has a good background description of these types of alloys and their microstructural characteristics, and provides a solid motivation for the current work. The experimental procedures follow well-established and known approaches. The results of the investigation deals with a limited, though interesting, amount of work, and the paper is therefore merely suitable for consideration as a short communication or technical note. The conclusions are factual and contribute to the knowledge in this field. A reasonable number of references nicely concludes this piece of work. Editor: The reviewer has not recommended any changes, however there are very minor areas of your paper that need attention: 1. In Figure 3 use correct spelling of 'Vickers' for vertical axis label. 2. Include university email address in contact details. [ Last edited by gdk199 on 2010-6-10 at 19:58 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题，而不是去凝练问题
已经有11人回复
-
要骂人了，新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西，结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够
已经有17人回复
-
基金系统什么内容也没有
已经有10人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有5人回复
-
梦想
已经有8人回复
-
面上合作单位盖章
已经有9人回复
-
面上函评意见出来了，像什么等级？
已经有17人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有14人回复
-
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有12人回复
  |
76楼2010-06-07 16:54:30
4楼2010-06-07 13:52:35
gdk199
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1414.8
- 散金: 504
- 红花: 14
- 帖子: 325
- 在线: 123.8小时
- 虫号: 781471
- 注册: 2009-05-28
- 专业: 金属材料
6楼2010-06-07 13:53:38
★
gdk199(金币+1):谢谢参与
gdk199(金币+1):谢谢参与
|
祝福~~~ |
7楼2010-06-07 13:57:05
30