24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

zengflgx

铜虫 (著名写手)

应助: 24 (小学生)
金币: 1126.5
散金: 1076
红花: 11
帖子: 1980
在线: 453.1小时
虫号: 736791
注册: 2009-03-31
专业: 金属结构材料

[交流] 急！！求助论坛大牛---这样的审稿意见还有救吗？？已有17人参与

本人上个月中旬在《Materials Science and Engineering a》上投了一篇稿子，今天来审稿意见了，编辑建议根据审稿人意见修改后再发过去，截止日期是8月29日，审稿人意见如下：
Reviewer #1: The authors reported the Microstructure characteristics and deformation mechanism of ... under high strain rates compression. The article can not be published in its current format.

The content of the article is not novel. There are not much new compared to the previous work reported and the work of the authors. In order to prepare the article for publication detailed microstructural characterization is needed. TEM figures are poorly presented. There are many speculations in the manuscript with out proper references, supportive information and arguments. The deformation mechanism described is questionable. The authors use of English is understandable but needs improvement.

本人看了审稿人的意见后觉得无从修改，最要命的是“detailed microstructural characterization is needed. TEM figures are poorly presented. ”感觉好像还要做TEM检测，但之前的那个样品已经全部用完了，再补充做一些检测已经不可能了。

请问大牛们，像这种情况文章还有没有救？？

请大家给我点意见，如何修改此论文能让审稿人满意？？

非常感谢！

回复此楼