24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 352  |  回复: 2
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

rena6816

至尊木虫 (著名写手)

[交流] 【分享】Artificially created cell called a scientific feat - 人造细胞: 科学的壮 已有2人参与

LA TIMES

Artificially created cell called a scientific feat

By Thomas H. Maugh II and Shari Roan, Los Angeles Times
May 20, 2010 | 2:55 p.m.

Molecular biologists say they have created the first bacterium controlled by synthesized DNA. The research, a major step toward artificial life, is called a 'tour de force.'

In a major step toward the creation of artificial life, researchers announced Thursday that they've created the first cell controlled entirely by laboratory-synthesized DNA.

The feat shows that synthesizing a genome and having it control a cell can be done — and it paves the way for the creation of microbes with specialized properties that could be of great value to industry.

Molecular biologist J. Craig Venter, the primary author of the report detailing the findings, described the converted cell as "the first self-replicating species we've had on the planet whose parent is a computer."

The achievement is notable both from a scientific standpoint and from a practical one, said microbiologist Clyde Hutchison of the J. Craig Venter Institute in La Jolla, a co-author of the paper. "From a practical aspect, this should enable building cells that have things added that will help with a variety of social needs."

The institute is already working with funding from BP and Exxon to create biofuels that would reduce our dependence on petroleum. It is also trying to develop bacteria that could gobble up oil spills like that in the Gulf of Mexico.

Other researchers have made microorganisms that can achieve such feats by tweaking existing microbes with one or two added genes. But a purpose-designed organism created from scratch would presumably be much more efficient, and it should be easier to control its products.

Experts said, however, that it would be at least five years before such organisms could be created. "There are major hurdles that need to be overcome first," said molecular geneticist Paul Keim of Northern Arizona University. The most serious one is getting all the added genes to work together. The genome Venter copied "was already a product of millions of years of evolution, and nature had already tweaked the interactions between genes."

"This is a tour de force and a landmark paper … that is akin to Jurassic Park or Frankenstein," said Dr. Anthony C. Forster, a molecular biologist at Vanderbilt University who is an expert in the field of artificial life forms. "I think it will probably be regarded as the dawn of synthetic genomics."

Neither Keim nor Forster were involved in the new research.

Although most scientists overwhelmingly praised the achievement, reported online by the journal Science, some environmental groups warned against unforeseen consequences, similar to those expressed about genetically modified food or other bio-engineered products.

Friends of the Earth called on governmental agencies to begin regulating synthetic biology experiments. The technology watchdog Action Group on Erosion, Technology and Concentration, or ETC Group, a Canadian organization concerned about the effects of new technologies on marginalized peoples, went even further, calling for a moratorium on the work.

"The government and society in general are not ready for self-replicating artificial life forms," said ETC Executive Director Pat Mooney. "There hasn't been adequate monitoring of this while it was being developed. It's being born into this environment where there is no real regulation and no understanding of it."

But, in this case, the artificially created cell — a bacterium — did not have any unusual characteristics, because the inserted DNA was a chemical copy of an existing genome.

The new results reported by Venter and his colleagues did not surprise people who monitor developments in artificial life. Venter, best known for his work on the Human Genome Project, has been inching toward this point for years.

Their first major step occurred in 2007 when the team removed the genome from one bacterium and transplanted into a microbe of a different species. The recipient, which had been stripped of its own genome, then behaved like the donor species. Learning how to do that was the key step in the process, Hutchison said.

A year later, the researchers showed that they could add marker genes to the donated genome of Mycoplasma genitalium so they could identify it accurately in daughter cells.

To complete the project, they sequenced the genome of Mycoplasma mycoides. Last year, they showed that they could modify the M. mycoides DNA to carry markers that would allow them to track it after it had been inserted into another bacterium, the related species, M. capricolum.

The researchers then ordered a DNA copy of the genome in bits and pieces that they then had to assemble. It was necessary to order short segments because the technology for synthesizing DNA lags well behind that for sequencing it.

Working in yeast, the researchers assembled these fragments. To further identify the material, they inserted sequences of DNA that, in code, contained an e-mail address for the project, the names of several participants and a selection of famous quotations. They also inserted a gene that would cause the cells to turn blue.

After much work, they succeeded in inserting the synthetic M. mycoides genome into M. capricolum from which all DNA had been removed, and they got the bacterium to grow. The host bacterium made proteins characteristic of M. mycoides and otherwise behaved just like it.

Meanwhile, it is highly unlikely that the technology could be put to use by terrorists because of the great cost and the amount of time required — about $40 million so far over 15 years.

.

Molecular biologist J. Craig Venter, best known for his work on the Human Genome Project, has been inching toward this accomplishment for years. (Matt Houston, Associated Press / May 21, 2010)
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zzp530135

金虫 (小有名气)

自由人


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
确实是里程碑!为之振奋!
做一只正常的虫虫
3楼2010-05-24 23:56:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 3 个回答

wenzi6337

木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
里程碑呀!每个学生物的都应因此振奋。
2楼2010-05-22 15:00:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 材料学调剂 +9 提神豆沙包 2026-02-28 11/550 2026-03-01 18:15 by ms629
[考研] 材料类求调剂 +10 wana_kiko 2026-02-28 11/550 2026-03-01 18:11 by 海嵙Y
[考研] 328求调剂 +3 aaadim 2026-03-01 5/250 2026-03-01 17:29 by njzyff
[考研] 化工专硕348,一志愿985求调剂 +5 弗格个 2026-02-28 8/400 2026-03-01 17:25 by sunny81
[考研] 285求调剂 +8 满头大汗的学生 2026-02-28 8/400 2026-03-01 16:47 by caszguilin
[考研] 材料化工调剂 +9 今夏不夏 2026-03-01 10/500 2026-03-01 16:01 by hmn_wj
[考研] 295求调剂 +6 19171856320 2026-02-28 6/300 2026-03-01 15:52 by jxstnuZYX
[考研] 0856调剂 +4 刘梦微 2026-02-28 4/200 2026-03-01 15:35 by 吸一口猫气
[考研] 304求调剂 +6 曼殊2266 2026-02-28 7/350 2026-03-01 15:14 by wjLi2017
[考研] 298求调剂 +9 人间唯你是清欢 2026-02-28 12/600 2026-03-01 14:23 by Ducount.Y
[考研] 284求调剂 +6 天下熯 2026-02-28 6/300 2026-03-01 14:19 by Ducount.Y
[考研] 材料284求调剂,一志愿郑州大学英一数二专硕 +10 想上岸的土拨鼠 2026-02-28 10/500 2026-03-01 14:12 by yc258
[考研] 306分材料调剂 +3 chuanzhu川烛 2026-03-01 4/200 2026-03-01 12:32 by houyaoxu
[考研] 302材料工程求调剂 +4 Doleres 2026-03-01 5/250 2026-03-01 11:52 by liqiongjy
[考研] 272求调剂 +5 材紫有化 2026-02-28 5/250 2026-03-01 11:51 by gaoxiaoniuma
[考博] 博士自荐 +4 kkluvs 2026-02-28 4/200 2026-03-01 10:19 by 馥安馥安
[考研] 264求调剂 +3 巴拉巴拉根556 2026-02-28 3/150 2026-02-28 21:31 by gaoxiaoniuma
[考研] 085600材料工程一志愿中科大总分312求调剂 +8 吃宵夜1 2026-02-28 10/500 2026-02-28 20:27 by L135790
[考研] 276求调剂 +3 路lyh123 2026-02-28 4/200 2026-02-28 19:45 by 路lyh123
[高分子] 求环氧树脂研发1名 +3 孙xc 2026-02-25 11/550 2026-02-28 16:57 by ichall
信息提示
请填处理意见