| 查看: 4383 | 回复: 11 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
qq-1984-19铜虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
food hydrocolloids 小修，多长时间能接受，（附审稿意见） 已有8人参与
|
||
|
《Food Hydrocolloids》我的投的文章经历一个月的under review上周一返回， 下面是审稿意见： Dear ##, We have now received the reports from the Reviewers regarding your paper which has been submitted for publication in Food Hydrocolloids. The Reviewers have been generally supportive of your work. Reviewer 1 has indicated that the paper can be published without change while Reviewer 2 has indicated that some revision is required before it can be accepted for publication. For your guidance, Reviewer 2 comments are appended below. If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript. Reviewer #2: comments The research report shows the suitability of ### for the role of emulsifiers. Data of photometric and rheological measurements are used to explain the way of interaction between proteins and oil droplets. Micrographs, SDS-PAGE and a variation with ß-mercaptoethanol help to understand the background of microstructure formation. Results are presented and discussed in a clear and very comprehensive way. Some data of comparable emulsifier systems of other protein sources could be added to allow the reader to see the performance of this new emulsifier system on a first glance. Therefore, the research report is recommended for publication, if following remarks are considered: p.5, l.99 The preliminary study showed that at pH 4 the maximum amount of ### was obtained. The reader might be interested about more details of protein fractions present in ###, their functional groups and the range of their isoelectrical points. p.9, l.183 Change order: (5, 15, 25, 35, and 45%v/v) were 10.17, 6.07, 4.25, 3.5 and 3.2 µm respectively. => (5, 15, 25, 35, and 45%v/v) were 3.2, 3.5, 4.25, 6.07 and 10.17 µm respectively. p.12, l.258 Maybe a table with emulsifier performance data of the other mentioned proteins might help the reader to get a feeling about these characteristics at one view. p.12, l.269 Add more details about the similar trend observed for BSA. p.14, l.308 Add (1996): e.g. with the explanation of Srinivasan, Singh & Munro (1996) for sodium caseinate behaviour. 主编没有说是大修还是小修，只是让修改，修改稿是上周五投出去的，但是今天还没有消息，不知道大家的稿件小修后多长时间能接受，我随时更新进展，请大家多关注，多讨论，谢谢！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有15人回复
-
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题，而不是去凝练问题
已经有14人回复
-
要骂人了，新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西，结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够
已经有17人回复
-
基金系统什么内容也没有
已经有10人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有5人回复
-
面上合作单位盖章
已经有9人回复
-
面上函评意见出来了，像什么等级？
已经有17人回复
-
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 网上申请博士后出站---多长时间能批下来?
已经有20人回复
- 有没有投Letters in applied microbiology小修后还under review两个周没结果的
已经有10人回复
- 大家倒时差用了多长时间呢，我已经失眠五天了，苦啊！
已经有3人回复
- 论文小修关于误差棒的问题
已经有16人回复
- Electrochimica Acta 大修后修改稿一般审稿多长时间
已经有13人回复
- 大伙联培都申请的多长时间？
已经有5人回复
- 请问大家谁知道环境科学学报的终审需要多长时间，终审后录用的概率大不
已经有8人回复
- 第一篇sci-小修后提交时间问题求助
已经有13人回复
- 《Food Hydrocolloids》状态变为required reviews completed已持续两周
已经有14人回复
- 小修一般多长时间修回合适？
已经有11人回复
- food chemistry， required reviews completed 一般多长时间
已经有20人回复
- 求助Food Hydrocolloids 的投稿要求
已经有5人回复
yfzou_njau
金虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 316.8
- 散金: 200
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 294
- 在线: 32.6小时
- 虫号: 409104
- 注册: 2007-06-21
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 食品加工学基础
9楼2010-05-20 16:31:43
qq-1984-19
铜虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 4.8
- 散金: 6
- 帖子: 177
- 在线: 139小时
- 虫号: 949371
- 注册: 2010-01-27
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 营养与代谢生理学
2楼2010-05-19 10:40:08
prigogin
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 8 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1462.7
- 散金: 30
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 310
- 在线: 200.8小时
- 虫号: 306460
- 注册: 2006-12-15
- 专业: 生物化工与食品化工
3楼2010-05-19 11:13:44
jiaoxg
木虫之王 (文学泰斗)
- 应助: 166 (高中生)
- 金币: 152849
- 散金: 524
- 红花: 35
- 沙发: 4
- 帖子: 120388
- 在线: 9005.8小时
- 虫号: 256221
- 注册: 2006-06-03
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 昆虫学
4楼2010-05-19 11:15:53
20