| 查看: 3499 | 回复: 11 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
qq-1984-19铜虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
food hydrocolloids 小修,多长时间能接受,(附审稿意见) 已有8人参与
|
||
|
《Food Hydrocolloids》我的投的文章经历一个月的under review上周一返回, 下面是审稿意见: Dear ##, We have now received the reports from the Reviewers regarding your paper which has been submitted for publication in Food Hydrocolloids. The Reviewers have been generally supportive of your work. Reviewer 1 has indicated that the paper can be published without change while Reviewer 2 has indicated that some revision is required before it can be accepted for publication. For your guidance, Reviewer 2 comments are appended below. If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript. Reviewer #2: comments The research report shows the suitability of ### for the role of emulsifiers. Data of photometric and rheological measurements are used to explain the way of interaction between proteins and oil droplets. Micrographs, SDS-PAGE and a variation with ß-mercaptoethanol help to understand the background of microstructure formation. Results are presented and discussed in a clear and very comprehensive way. Some data of comparable emulsifier systems of other protein sources could be added to allow the reader to see the performance of this new emulsifier system on a first glance. Therefore, the research report is recommended for publication, if following remarks are considered: p.5, l.99 The preliminary study showed that at pH 4 the maximum amount of ### was obtained. The reader might be interested about more details of protein fractions present in ###, their functional groups and the range of their isoelectrical points. p.9, l.183 Change order: (5, 15, 25, 35, and 45%v/v) were 10.17, 6.07, 4.25, 3.5 and 3.2 µm respectively. => (5, 15, 25, 35, and 45%v/v) were 3.2, 3.5, 4.25, 6.07 and 10.17 µm respectively. p.12, l.258 Maybe a table with emulsifier performance data of the other mentioned proteins might help the reader to get a feeling about these characteristics at one view. p.12, l.269 Add more details about the similar trend observed for BSA. p.14, l.308 Add (1996): e.g. with the explanation of Srinivasan, Singh & Munro (1996) for sodium caseinate behaviour. 主编没有说是大修还是小修,只是让修改,修改稿是上周五投出去的,但是今天还没有消息,不知道大家的稿件小修后多长时间能接受,我随时更新进展,请大家多关注,多讨论,谢谢! |
» 猜你喜欢
论文终于录用啦!满足毕业条件了
已经有12人回复
2025年遐想
已经有4人回复
投稿Elsevier的杂志(返修),总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
求个博导看看
已经有18人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
网上申请博士后出站---多长时间能批下来?
已经有20人回复
有没有投Letters in applied microbiology小修后还under review两个周没结果的
已经有10人回复
大家倒时差用了多长时间呢,我已经失眠五天了,苦啊!
已经有3人回复
论文小修关于误差棒的问题
已经有16人回复
Electrochimica Acta 大修后修改稿一般审稿多长时间
已经有13人回复
大伙联培都申请的多长时间?
已经有5人回复
请问大家谁知道环境科学学报的终审需要多长时间,终审后录用的概率大不
已经有8人回复
第一篇sci-小修后提交时间问题求助
已经有13人回复
《Food Hydrocolloids》状态变为required reviews completed已持续两周
已经有14人回复
小修一般多长时间修回合适?
已经有11人回复
food chemistry, required reviews completed 一般多长时间
已经有20人回复
求助Food Hydrocolloids 的投稿要求
已经有5人回复
sleepyhkyo
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 4 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 7950.4
- 散金: 1400
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 1308
- 在线: 278.9小时
- 虫号: 89368
- 注册: 2005-08-28
- 专业: 有色金属冶金
8楼2010-05-20 11:20:19







回复此楼