| 查看: 1364 | 回复: 12 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
论文被拒 已有12人参与
|
|||
|
Dear : Thank you for your email and attachment, received 19 April 2010. Your paper, like all recently submitted papers, has been the subject of a preliminary review. Unfortunately we will not be sending your paper for a full formal review because we think that the 'goodness of fit' between your paper and our Journal is questionable. The main reason for not proceeding with a full review is that, as I understand it, your paper is essentially an interesting treatment of an established but little understood problem employing a novel analytical method. In my view, however, it does not present substantive explanatory research findings of interest to the truly international readership of TPT, in the sense of providing novel insights or contributing significant additional value. However, it may be that a different journal (e.g., Transportation) might be more supportive of your work. I realise this is not the response you were looking for but trust that you will understand our reasoning. Please do not interpret this result as a lack of interest in your research area because that is not the case. But in future we are looking for more empirically based and explanatory research results that fit well with the aims and scope of the Journal. Thank you for your interest in our Journal. Sincerely David Gillingwater Editor Transportation Planning & Technology 论文2周后被拒,期刊的效率挺高的,有点小失望。 |
» 猜你喜欢
职称评审没过,求安慰
已经有41人回复
回收溶剂求助
已经有7人回复
硝基苯如何除去
已经有3人回复
A期刊撤稿
已经有4人回复
垃圾破二本职称评审标准
已经有17人回复
投稿Elsevier的Neoplasia杂志,到最后选publishing options时页面空白,不能完成投稿
已经有22人回复
EST投稿状态问题
已经有7人回复
毕业后当辅导员了,天天各种学生超烦
已经有4人回复
求助文献
已经有3人回复
投稿返修后收到这样的回复,还有希望吗
已经有8人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
3楼2010-05-11 12:27:07
2楼2010-05-11 12:14:21
feitian1984
银虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 4 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 326.8
- 散金: 444
- 帖子: 816
- 在线: 42.6小时
- 虫号: 940460
- 注册: 2010-01-11
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 海洋地质学
4楼2010-05-11 12:34:12
6楼2010-05-11 12:47:04













回复此楼