24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前主题已经存档。

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

meizhou

木虫 (知名作家)

沉墨于心，不没于物

应助: 14 (小学生)
贵宾: 0.1
金币: 1832
散金: 717
红花: 13
帖子: 6386
在线: 504.1小时
虫号: 69921
注册: 2005-05-24
性别: GG
专业: 食品科学基础

[交流] 小修后又苦等来小小修，先散点录用了再给大家红包已有74人参与

小修后等待了5个多月，先后三次催问编辑都不回邮件，火气很大郁闷中终于迎来了第二次修改。第一次审稿中Reviewer: 3强烈推荐发表，所以第二次审稿好像编辑没有找他；Reviewer: 1看来对我的修改很满意；只有Reviewer: 2是我认为故意要卡我的那个家伙，我在参考文献中添加了他的几篇文章后，他终于给出了比较正规的Comments。

Associate Editor: *&^$
Comments to the Author:
Detailed responses to each review comment should be in a separate file and the revisions should be highlighted in the returned manuscript so the changes are easily identified.
There are numerous grammatical errors in the revised manuscript that must be corrected before the manuscript is acceptable for publication.
Each of the figure legends contain results and discussion information that should be moved to the text of the manuscript.

Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:

Reviewer: 1
Comments to the Author
(There are no comments)

Reviewer: 2
Comments to the Author
It does appear that the majority of the reviewer's comments have been addressed. However there are one or two issues that need to be addressed.

In general the authors need to ensure when they express concentrations as % values they state whether they are w/w or v/w.

Line 112 to 117: Method of quantification for nuclear morphological changes in muscles needs to be described.

Figure 1. data describing the % values needs to be included in the main body of the text rather than in the figure legend.

Figure 3 and 4. what are the error bars???

[ Last edited by meizhou on 2010-4-8 at 17:23 ]

回复此楼