| 查看: 3196 | 回复: 63 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
redpighead新虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
第一篇SCI文章 收到decision letter，贴全部内容，有礼品！ 已有61人参与
|
||
|
第一篇SCI文章 收到decision letter，贴全部内容，请高手支招，还有没有希望？希望多大？如果这篇文章最终能发表，凡是跟帖的均可得到礼品一份。本人QQ：5326376 如加我请注明：SCI交流 03-Apr-2010 Dear Dr. ****: Thank you for submitting your paper ******** to us. We are sorry to say it is not acceptable in its current form for publication in "Tissue Engineering" yet it has the potential, given substantial revision, to meet the level of quality needed for publication in the Journal. This will ultimately need to be determined based upon a revision and resubmission of the manuscript. Comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter for your guidance in revision. We receive a large number of manuscripts, and we can only accept those that reflect the top 15 percent of the work in the field and whose publication will have corresponding impact. If you would like us to reconsider your work for publication in "Tissue Engineering" please submit a revision which reflects changes as indicated in the reviewer(s) comments. Please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point that is stated when you submit the revised manuscript. To revise your manuscript, log into **** and enter your Author Center. You will find your manuscript title listed under "Manuscripts with Decisions." Under "Actions," click on "Create a Revision." You will notice the manuscript number has been appended to denote a revision. You will not be able to make your revisions on the originally submitted version of the manuscript. Instead, revise your manuscript using a word processing program and save it on your computer. PLEASE ALSO HIGHLIGHT THE CHANGES TO YOUR MANUSCRIPT WITHIN THE DOCUMENT BY USING THE TRACK CHANGES MODE IN MS WORD OR BY USING BOLD OR COLORED TEXT. You can upload the revised manuscript when it is prepared and submit it through your Author Center. You will be able to respond at this time to comments made by the reviewer(s) in the space provided. It is important to be very specific in your responses to these comments. This space may also be used to document any changes you made to the original manuscript. IMPORTANT: Your original files are available to you when you upload your revised manuscript. Please delete any redundant files before completing the submission. We are trying to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to the Journal. Your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible but within three months at the latest, or we may have to consider your paper as a new submission. Thank you for submitting your manuscript to "Tissue Engineering," and we look forward to receiving your revision. Sincerely, **** Reviewer(s) Comments to Author and Score Sheet: Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Reject & Resubmit - Quality Assignment is below 15% but the manuscript has significant potential to be brought above 15% with revision. Comments: This study has assessed the effects of embedding purported ****. ****. However, the paper suffers several weaknesses : 1**** 2**** 3**** 4**** 5**** Additional Questions: Does this manuscript reflect the top 15 percent of work in the field of tissue engineering?: No Does the manuscript contain errors of fact or logic?: No To your knowledge, is the work original?: No Which diagrams do you feel should be reproduced?: Does the summary bring out the main points of the paper?: Yes Is the title suitable?: Yes Are the references adequate?: Yes Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Reject & Resubmit - Quality Assignment is below 15% but the manuscript has significant potential to be brought above 15% with revision. Comments: The manuscript of Guo et al. ****. The manuscript is clear and well written. The methodology used is adequate. However, it could be desirable the inclusion of an experimental group ****. In “Measurement of ****” the authors should explain how assessed an exact equal region for comparison (How many **** have been cut? How did they decide what compare? ). The methodology used by the authors is no t novel ( see ****). The authors claim “To date, this is the only study that has investigated the ****. This sentence is unfortunate. The authors just demonstrate the useful ****. Nonetheless, due to the methodological similarities with **** papers the authors should include both among the references. The authors should make an effort to adapt the discussion and conclusions to the real contribution of the mauscript. Additional Questions: Does this manuscript reflect the top 15 percent of work in the field of tissue engineering?: No Does the manuscript contain errors of fact or logic?: No To your knowledge, is the work original?: Yes Which diagrams do you feel should be reproduced?: Does the summary bring out the main points of the paper?: Yes Is the title suitable?: Yes Are the references adequate?: No |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
什么时候开奖？
已经有4人回复
-
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有27人回复
-
为什么余额宝的年化利率越来越低？主要原因有哪些？
已经有3人回复
-
2027广东省杰青
已经有9人回复
-
朋友圈看到的
已经有5人回复
-
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有110人回复
-
明天放榜？
已经有5人回复
-
时间戳变了，能看出什么问题？
已经有11人回复
-
重要消息，中午系统在维护
已经有10人回复
-
投稿咨询
已经有6人回复
2楼2010-04-05 22:19:11
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
3楼2010-04-05 22:30:22
4楼2010-04-05 22:30:57
xukewei
铁杆木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 18 (小学生)
- 贵宾: 0.126
- 金币: 5146.5
- 散金: 662
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 983
- 在线: 497.4小时
- 虫号: 85195
- 注册: 2005-08-09
- 专业: 生物地质学
5楼2010-04-05 22:44:47
heixiaohu
木虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 3385.8
- 散金: 160
- 帖子: 66
- 在线: 313.9小时
- 虫号: 868046
- 注册: 2009-10-11
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 光谱分析
6楼2010-04-05 22:46:02
ivanfigo
新虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1303.2
- 散金: 2961
- 红花: 11
- 帖子: 376
- 在线: 285.4小时
- 虫号: 294980
- 注册: 2006-11-11
- 专业: 聚合物共混与复合材料
7楼2010-04-05 22:50:23
smilerobin
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 87 (初中生)
- 金币: 24720.3
- 散金: 600
- 红花: 44
- 帖子: 10736
- 在线: 800.1小时
- 虫号: 771843
- 注册: 2009-05-16
- 专业: 自然地理学
8楼2010-04-05 22:56:02
9楼2010-04-05 23:00:10
10楼2010-04-05 23:15:14
