24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1625  |  回复: 10
当前主题已经存档。
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

pidou

木虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 求助修改意见

以下是文章投出去后返回的意见,请大家帮忙给分析一下,(1)看一看还有没有希望投出去;(2)看一看该怎么修改比较好。

谢谢大家啦!~~


Dear Dr. ....,


Thank you for submitting your work to Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. Before we pass on manuscripts to the Journal Editor, who is responsible for the scientific assessment, we perform an initial check against formal technical criteria (structure of submission, adherence to the Guide for Authors and English language usage).

We regret to inform you that your manuscript does not meet the journal's required standard. Please make changes/corrections as detailed in the comments below.

When you resubmit your manuscript, please also provide a separate sheet listing your responses to the problems that were raised and upload it under the submission item 'Responses to Technical Check Results'. A sample of the "Responses" sheet can be found at: http://www.elsevierscitech.com/l ... Technical_Check.pdf
We regret that without a completed "Responses" sheet, your manuscript will not be further processed.

Before resubmitting your manuscript, please make sure that every aspect of the manuscript is in accordance with the Guide for Authors which is available at http://ees.elsevier.com/ees/ top of screen.

PLEASE NOTE: Resubmission is not a guarantee that your submission will subsequently proceed to the peer review process, which is a decision to be made at the sole discretion of the journal editor.

Yours sincerely,
Jacquelyn Quinonez
Journal Manager
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety

Comments:

1) Ethical statement for animal experiment should be provided in the Material and Method section.

**********************************************************************************************************************
If you have difficulty with the English language, you may contact one of the following language editing services.

Elsevier Language Editing Services https://languageediting.elsevier.com/
Asia Science Editing http://www.asiascienceediting.com/
Diacritech Language Editing Services http://www.languageedit.com/
Edanz Editing http://www.edanzediting.com/
International Science Editing http://www.internationalscienceediting.com/
ScienceDocs Editing Services http://www.sciencedocs.com/
SPI Publisher Services http://www.prof-editing.com/

Please note: Elsevier neither endorses nor takes responsibility for any products, goods or services offered by outside vendors through our services or advertised on this website. For more information please refer to our Terms & Conditions at the link below:

http://elsevier.com/wps/find/ter ... ome/termsconditions
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家

pidou(金币+1):谢谢,能否接着回答疑问?? 2010-03-09 22:27
噢,一般的意见是在系统里。不过你这好像是还没有送审。

那个comment是要你确认你的实验没有道德或伦理问题。然后才能送交编辑处理(送审)。
引用回帖:
Originally posted by pidou at 2010-03-09 22:13:25:
不好意思,还要麻烦你。你的话我还不是很明白。能帮我看一下,审稿人的主要问题是“comments”吗??能说的清楚一点吗,小弟笨拙请见谅。若能谈一下修改的具体方法将不胜感激。


6楼2010-03-09 22:23:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 11 个回答

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家

这封信是模板信,不过有这句“Please make changes/corrections”,肯定是修改再投了。将审稿人题的主要问题回应了,接收就没有问题。
2楼2010-03-09 22:02:55
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

pidou

木虫 (正式写手)

不好意思,还要麻烦你。你的话我还不是很明白。能帮我看一下,审稿人的主要问题是“comments”吗??能说的清楚一点吗,小弟笨拙请见谅。若能谈一下修改的具体方法将不胜感激。
引用回帖:
Originally posted by visitor958 at 2010-03-09 22:02:55:
这封信是模板信,不过有这句“Please make changes/corrections”,肯定是修改再投了。将审稿人题的主要问题回应了,接收就没有问题。

3楼2010-03-09 22:13:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

paperpublishing

铜虫 (著名写手)

对动物实验不太懂,呵呵
RPisalwaysinbalance
4楼2010-03-09 22:15:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见