| 查看: 267 | 回复: 0 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
[交流]
急求如何回复审稿意见
|
|||
| 小弟：最近一篇外文审回来了，Reviewer #: This is a generally clearly written manuscript that is of some interest. However, the discussion section is rather difficult to follow, and needs quite extensive revision. The fact that only one wild type strain of ......was tested is a weakness, because it gives the reader little assurance that the mutant strains truly had different characteristics.Reviewer #2: -The paper has several spelling and grammatical mistakes. some are summarized below接下来就是审稿专家给出具体的错误以及他给改的正确写法。我在文章中做了相应修改，就不知道如何下回复，求各位大虾给我意见，谢谢了 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
科研求助
已经有4人回复
-
博士去二本高校当辅导员，如何调整心态？
已经有11人回复
-
面上有专家说实验设备不是我们单位的
已经有6人回复
-
江苏省自然基金 什么时候出结果
已经有6人回复
-
广西大学-广州大学招聘博士后 欢迎广大优秀人才！！！
已经有11人回复
-
闲聊
已经有3人回复
-
两块石头
已经有10人回复
-
初秋的晨风
已经有6人回复