| 查看: 272 | 回复: 0 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
[交流]
急求如何回复审稿意见
|
|||
| 小弟：最近一篇外文审回来了，Reviewer #: This is a generally clearly written manuscript that is of some interest. However, the discussion section is rather difficult to follow, and needs quite extensive revision. The fact that only one wild type strain of ......was tested is a weakness, because it gives the reader little assurance that the mutant strains truly had different characteristics.Reviewer #2: -The paper has several spelling and grammatical mistakes. some are summarized below接下来就是审稿专家给出具体的错误以及他给改的正确写法。我在文章中做了相应修改，就不知道如何下回复，求各位大虾给我意见，谢谢了 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
40+中年人失业后，还能找到好工作吗？
已经有19人回复
-
关于核磁制样
已经有3人回复
-
郑州大学申博
已经有6人回复
-
人工智能虚构史料、伪造文献频现，多家期刊声明抵制
已经有5人回复
-
CsPbI2Br全无机钙钛矿SEM图像异常分析
已经有8人回复
-
申请科研项目纯靠实力能成功吗？
已经有12人回复