| ²é¿´: 808 | »Ø¸´: 8 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
lotus86гæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
|
[½»Á÷]
±à¼»ØÐÅ£¬´ó¼Ò¿´¿´ÓÐÏ·Âð£¿Ð»Ð»°¡
|
||
|
ÎÄÕ±»¾Ü£¬È»ºóÉê±ç£¬±à¼»ØÐÅÈçÏ£º ¡°I apologize for the later reply to your mail dated 21th February regarding the rejection of your manuscript. As already mentioned in my first mail EJPS gets a significant number of manuscript and many more of good scientific quality than can be published. So as editors we are under a certain pressure and often have to reject manuscript we would have been pleased to publish if the journal had more volumes available. My rejection was as you could see based on the comments primarily by reviewer 1 who asked questions on novelty. I have been carefully through your manuscript again and from a general point of view I still agree with the reviewer. However, I would be prepare to look at the manuscript ¨C but as a new submission ¨C if are able to revise the manuscript and clearly work and discuss the novelty compared the e.g. prof. Augustijns¡¯s work e.g. more focus on ¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£¡± . |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
ΪʲôÖйú´óѧ¹¤¿Æ½ÌÊÚÃÇË®ÁËÄÇô¶àËùνµÄ¶¥»á¶¥¿¯£¬µ«»¹ÊÇ×ö²»³öÓîÊ÷»úÆ÷ÈË£¿
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
qqsvery
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 2895.9
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 1688
- ÔÚÏß: 18.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 592166
- ×¢²á: 2008-09-03
- רҵ: ÔìѪ¡¢ÔìѪµ÷¿ØÓëÔìѪ΢»·
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
|
discuss the novelty compared the e.g. prof. Augustijns¡¯s work e.g. ¿´À´Éó¸åÈ˶ÔÎÄÕµĴ´Ðµã°ÑÎÕ²»Çå³þ£¬ÖÂʹ±à¼Ò²still agree with the reviewer¡£ Ôٸĸİɣ¡¿Ù³öÎÄÕµĴ´ÐµãÀ´£¬ÕûÀíÔÚÕªÒª´¦~×£ºÃÔËÁË£¡ |

7Â¥2010-03-06 15:25:04
head8882000
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 974.5
- É¢½ð: 206
- ºì»¨: 4
- Ìû×Ó: 764
- ÔÚÏß: 1024Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 450665
- ×¢²á: 2007-11-04
- רҵ: ²©Îï¹Ýѧ
2Â¥2010-03-06 11:47:58
micronwang
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 4713.8
- Ìû×Ó: 625
- ÔÚÏß: 384.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 336510
- ×¢²á: 2007-04-01
- רҵ: Äý¾Û̬ÎïÐÔ II £ºµç×ӽṹ
3Â¥2010-03-06 11:48:40
visitor958
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
IEEEÔÓÖ¾Óë»áÒéר¼Ò
- Ó¦Öú: 2283 (½²Ê¦)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.05
- ½ð±Ò: 17310
- É¢½ð: 2544
- ºì»¨: 76
- Ìû×Ó: 15735
- ÔÚÏß: 2926.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 489254
- ×¢²á: 2008-01-01
- רҵ: IEEE
ÖØÍ¶ÓÐÏ£Íû£¬µ«ÊÇ¡£¡£¡£
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
| Éó¸åÈ˺ͱ༶ÔÎÄÕµĴ´Ð³̶ÈÓÐÒÉÎÊ¡£×îºÃ¶à¼ÓЩÄÚÈÝ£¬Ò²°Ñ´´Ð³̶Ƚ²Çå³þ£¬ÈÃËûÃÇÈÏΪÎÄÕ´ﵽһ¶¨Ë®Æ½²ÅºÃ¡£ |
4Â¥2010-03-06 12:01:26













.
»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥