| ²é¿´: 544 | »Ø¸´: 12 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
felicity6056ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)
|
[½»Á÷]
Çë¿´Õâ¸öÈçºÎ´¦Àí£¿£¨ÔÚÏߵȣ©
|
||
|
ǰ¶Îʱ¼äͶһƪÎÄÕ¸øÒ»¸öÔÓÖ¾£¬ÓÐÈý¸öÉó¸åÈË£¬ÆäÖÐÁ½¸ö¸øµÄ´óÐÞ£¬Ò»¸ö¸ø¾Ü¾øÁË£¬¶øÇҾܾøµÄÌØ±ð³¹µ×£¬±à¼Ò²¸ø¾Ü¾øÁË¡£ÏÖÔÚ¾¹ýÐÞ¸ÄÏëÁíͶËû¿¯£¬¿ÉÊÇÀϰå˵ÊÇÔÙͶ´ËÔÓÖ¾£¬»¹Òª¸½ÉÏÉϴα»¾ÜµÄ¸å×ÓºÍÐÞ¸ÄÈËÒâ¼ûÒÔ¼°×Ô¼ºµÄÐ޸Ļش𡣵«±¾ÈËÏë×÷ΪиåÖØÍ¶£¬ÇëÓоÑéµÄ³æ×Ó¿´¿´ÈçºÎÊǺã¿ÔÚÏߵȣ¬¶àлÀ²£¡ Comments: The authors provide a clear description of their work and provide an adequate positioning of their work in the context of already existing work in the open literature. However, I regret that I must say that the added value of the work does not seem to justify publication in an archive journal. It is not clear how the present reduced model performs better than existing ones. Moreover, the numerical simulations do not provide much more information. In fact, they are even a bit suspicious (see comment below). I have one specific question and 1 comment: - question: why is the temperature 1500K chosen? - comment: the air co-flow seems turbulent (Re = 3000 approximately), so how can laminar calculations be justified? Moreover, the only thing these simulations seem to show, is the impact of density (which is trivial) and confirmation of already presented chemical issues (which is also trivial, as chemistry can be seen as 'post-processing', in the physical flame structure.. So the added value is not clear. Moreover, more detail is required on the exact radiation and soot modelling. ±à¼µÄ¾Ü¾øÐÅ Dear Dr. Zhou: Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in xxx. It has been examined by expert reviewers whose reviews are enclosed. The reviewers have expressed serious reservations about this work that I don¡¯t believe could be addressed through a standard major revision. In light of the comments received, I am unable to accept the manuscript for publication in xxx. [ Last edited by felicity6056 on 2010-3-5 at 16:59 ] |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
085602µ÷¼Á ³õÊÔ×Ü·Ö335
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
302·Ö 085601Çóµ÷¼ÁÍÆ¼ö
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÉúÎïѧ308·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á£¨Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ª¶«Ê¦´ó£©
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏר˶(0856) 339·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
085410È˹¤ÖÇÄÜ ³õÊÔ316·Ö Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
282Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
070300»¯Ñ§Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
318Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
308Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
315Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´

weiswallow
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 10 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 10678.1
- É¢½ð: 4
- ºì»¨: 4
- Ìû×Ó: 3936
- ÔÚÏß: 738.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 600115
- ×¢²á: 2008-09-12
- רҵ: »¯Ñ§·´Ó¦¹¤³Ì

2Â¥2010-03-05 16:27:31
tower598
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
ÉÏÍø´ïÈË
- Ó¦Öú: 27 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 9803
- É¢½ð: 68
- ºì»¨: 8
- Ìû×Ó: 4583
- ÔÚÏß: 822.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 537773
- ×¢²á: 2008-04-01
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Äý¾Û̬ÎïÐÔ II £ºµç×ӽṹ
3Â¥2010-03-05 16:32:35
felicity6056
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 6 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.033
- ½ð±Ò: 10209.1
- É¢½ð: 389
- ºì»¨: 6
- Ìû×Ó: 6701
- ÔÚÏß: 1054.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 762546
- ×¢²á: 2009-05-04
- רҵ: »¯Ê¯ÄÜÔ´´¢´æÓëÊäËÍ

4Â¥2010-03-05 16:32:59
hubeiww
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 9 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1646.2
- É¢½ð: 2199
- ºì»¨: 8
- Ìû×Ó: 1770
- ÔÚÏß: 304.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 600554
- ×¢²á: 2008-09-12
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: °ëµ¼Ìå²ÄÁÏ
5Â¥2010-03-05 16:48:24
felicity6056
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 6 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.033
- ½ð±Ò: 10209.1
- É¢½ð: 389
- ºì»¨: 6
- Ìû×Ó: 6701
- ÔÚÏß: 1054.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 762546
- ×¢²á: 2009-05-04
- רҵ: »¯Ê¯ÄÜÔ´´¢´æÓëÊäËÍ

6Â¥2010-03-05 18:18:49
rll
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 17 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 12714.6
- É¢½ð: 129
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 2639
- ÔÚÏß: 831.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 543206
- ×¢²á: 2008-04-10
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ½ðÊô²ÄÁÏ

7Â¥2010-03-05 19:04:37
butterfly1234
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1612.2
- Ìû×Ó: 591
- ÔÚÏß: 485.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 465390
- ×¢²á: 2007-11-22
- רҵ: ÎÞ»ú·Ç½ðÊôÀà¹âµçÐÅÏ¢Ó빦
8Â¥2010-03-05 19:37:04
xukewei
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 18 (СѧÉú)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.126
- ½ð±Ò: 5146.5
- É¢½ð: 662
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 983
- ÔÚÏß: 497.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 85195
- ×¢²á: 2005-08-09
- רҵ: ÉúÎïµØÖÊѧ

9Â¥2010-03-05 20:04:04
»¨·É·É
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 35122.9
- É¢½ð: 43
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 5417
- ÔÚÏß: 381Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 578030
- ×¢²á: 2008-06-27
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: Ô˳ïÓë¹ÜÀí

10Â¥2010-03-05 20:05:30














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
5