| 查看: 920 | 回复: 9 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
sxs2006银虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
这种情况如何回复IEEE transaction审稿人的意见
|
||
|
投IEEE transaction的一片文章审稿回来了，主要的意见如下： AE：The idea is very interesting, but all the reviewers agree that the application is too simple. Review #1：The proposal presented in this paper is quite interesting. The new application is quite interesting and promising though several justifications should be included in order to clarify some decisions made in the paper. Review #2: The paper has shown a good application. The topic is very interesting and contribute the application with some distinctive features.... The methodology was detailed with also detailed experiments and evaluation. The paper was also well presented and organized. I suggest the paper can be accepted provided that the following comments can be addressed accordingly... Review #3: The approach in sections 4.2 and 4.3 is nothing new; The case study in section 5 seems rather simple...; what are contributions in section 4.2 and 4.3 There seems nothing. AE和2个审稿人的意见还都不错，但review 3直接拒了，提了些尖锐的意见，遇到这种情况，大家怎么回复审稿人的意见啊? 帮忙给些建议，录用的机率大吗？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有6人回复
8楼2010-03-04 20:11:05
sxs2006
银虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 211.1
- 散金: 38
- 帖子: 361
- 在线: 285.7小时
- 虫号: 491635
- 注册: 2008-01-07
- 专业: 管理心理与行为
2楼2010-03-04 15:00:15
5楼2010-03-04 19:08:19
sxs2006
银虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 211.1
- 散金: 38
- 帖子: 361
- 在线: 285.7小时
- 虫号: 491635
- 注册: 2008-01-07
- 专业: 管理心理与行为
6楼2010-03-04 19:22:28
40