| 查看: 475 | 回复: 6 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
【讨论】气候门：Nature主编辞职调查委员会
|
|||
|
Nature’s editor in chief has stepped down from the Russell Review inquiry into aspects of the ‘climate-gate’ emails, just hours after the inquiry team was unveiled. Philip Campbell stood down after it emerged he told a Chinese reporter last year that the scientists at the centre of the climate-gate row “have behaved as researchers should”. A key aspect of the review headed by Muir Russell is whether scientists at the University of East Anglia followed proper scientific procedures. In a statement released to the media yesterday, Campbell said “I made the remarks in good faith on the basis of media reports of the leaks. As I have made clear subsequently, I support the need to for a full review of the facts behind the leaked e-mails.” “There must be nothing that calls into question the ability of the independent Review to complete this task, and therefore I have decided to withdraw from the team.” Russell added, “I have spoken to Philip Campbell, and I understand why he has withdrawn. I regret the loss of his expertise, but I respect his decision.” Russell’s team yesterday announced the scope of their investigation, which was triggered by a vast number of emails stolen from the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit and published online. Some of the questions they are seeking to answer involve research published in Nature. Although Campbell and Russell faced questions over the independence of their review yesterday, it was the emergence of the Campbell’s interview with Chinese state radio that forced his resignation. “The scientists have not hidden the data. If you look at the emails there is one or two bits of language that are jargon used between professionals that suggest something to outsiders that is wrong,” Campbell said. “In fact the only problem there has been has been some problem with the official restrictions on their ability to disseminate their data. Otherwise they have behaved as researchers should.” See also Head of climate-gate inquiry defends independence http://blogs.nature.com/news/the ... ate_inquiry_de.html [ Last edited by risewithsu on 2010-2-16 at 10:38 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
355 B区地质调剂
已经有1人回复
-
西南科技大学 调剂 绵阳
已经有10人回复
-
地球物理学和空间物理学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有147人回复
-
解锁青少年负责任决策的关键：基于PISA 2022全球数据的SEL维度研究成果发表
已经有1人回复
-
散金币，求基金中标！！
已经有42人回复
7楼2010-02-16 10:39:54
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
4楼2010-02-15 11:47:21
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
 |
5楼2010-02-15 23:26:02
shxzx1300
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 7025.2
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 339
- 在线: 731.3小时
- 虫号: 546935
- 注册: 2008-04-16
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 地震学
6楼2010-02-16 10:33:09
