| 查看: 2212 | 回复: 39 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
文章被拒，很生气，能不能与主编辩争取重新决定呢？？？
|
|||
 ，刚看到文章悲剧了，郁闷啊，看到审稿意见更加郁闷了！本人6月就毕业了，还指望着这个毕业呢。。。。结果呜呼了！关键是这个意见不足以拒绝我的文章啊！ 为什么啊？ 为什么啊？ Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: The authors decribe ********. A very similar work has been published by Augustijns where increased absortion of **********. The authors should explain why they have selected ****among many possible esters for this study. In my opinion much impressive study could be obtained when ***** are included and compared. Reviewer #2: The manuscript for "Absorption enhancement of Adefovir Dipivoxil by incorporating esterase inhibitor ethyl oleate in emulsion as part of oil excipient" is extremely well designed. Authors discussed their results with most recent literature and cited most updated literature. Inserted tables and figures are high quality. 这个第一个审稿人貌似没能准确理解我这文章的意思啊，我这个工作根本没人做过，人家做的和我做的真的是100%不一样啊，怎么会是Similar work呢？？胡扯吧啦的，气煞我也！而且第二个审稿人说挺好的啊！ 我能否给编辑解释下第一个审稿人的意见不合适啊，给了不恰当的评论，要求重新决定啊！急盼前辈指点，晚辈感激不尽！ 谢谢大家！   |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
302求调剂一志愿华中师范大学
已经有8人回复
-
338求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
化学调剂
已经有12人回复
-
342求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
0835学硕299求调剂 08大类可接受
已经有4人回复
-
085602调剂 初试总分335
已经有3人回复
-
288环境专硕,求调材料方向
已经有5人回复
-
申博
已经有5人回复
-
081200-11408-276学硕求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
085600调剂
已经有4人回复
编辑终于回信了,大家帮忙看看吧！
 ，信件内容如下：I apologize for the later reply to your mail dated 21th February regarding the rejection of your manuscript. As already mentioned in my first mail EJPS gets a significant number of manuscript and many more of good scientific quality than can be published. So as editors we are under a certain pressure and often have to reject manuscript we would have been pleased to publish if the journal had more volumes available. My rejection was as you could see based on the comments primarily by reviewer 1 who asked questions on novelty. However, I have been carefully through your manuscript again and from a general point of view I still agree with the reviewer. However, I would be prepare to look at the manuscript – but as a new submission – if are able to revise the manuscript and clearly work and discuss the novelty compared the e.g. prof. Augustijns’s work e.g. more focus on functional excipients and lipid formulation. 大家帮忙看看觉得希望大吗？？？ |
32楼2010-03-06 10:45:09
努力着
荣誉版主 (职业作家)
低调隐士
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 2.114
- 金币: 10831.9
- 散金: 1152
- 红花: 22
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 4586
- 在线: 369.1小时
- 虫号: 161721
- 注册: 2006-01-09
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 信息安全
- 管辖: 学术会议交流
2楼2010-02-09 10:04:41
zhzimi_2007
木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1759.3
- 散金: 50
- 帖子: 3631
- 在线: 703.6小时
- 虫号: 450803
- 注册: 2007-11-04
- 专业: 应用数学方法
3楼2010-02-09 10:05:16
quan3145
铁杆木虫 (文学泰斗)
博士
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 44530.4
- 散金: 3777
- 红花: 107
- 沙发: 10
- 帖子: 57739
- 在线: 624.7小时
- 虫号: 794207
- 注册: 2009-06-14
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 发育生物学
4楼2010-02-09 10:05:47
