| 查看: 1675 | 回复: 7 | ||||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | ||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||||
[交流]
【原创】SCI期刊审稿人的一点建议
|
||||
|
已搜索，无重复！ 本人一次偶然的机会成为国外某期刊（制造管理方面，2005SCI影响因子0.556）的审稿人，在审稿过程中，结合期刊方面的要求，发现要在这些期刊上发表文章，以下几个方面必须做到（英文，相信大家肯定能看懂）： 1.Is the paper a research contribution, or is it a case study, a review, or a discussion? 2.Does the paper make a new and significant contribution to the literature in its own area? 3.Does the paper appropriately compare the performance of proposed methodologies with those found in the published literature? 4.Does the paper provide evidence of real or potential application for advancing manufacturing practice? 5.Is it a report of work done by the author(s) and does it state what the author(s) propose to do in the future? 6.Is adequate credit given to other contributors in the field and are references sufficiently complete? 7.Are the character and contents of the paper clear from the title and abstract? 8.Is the paper clearly, concisely, accurately and logically written? Are there any errors? Could it benefit from condensing or expansion? 以上几个问题最好不要让审稿人给“NO”，否则可能会比较危险。而且这些都是一些最基本的方面。 由于本人是管理学方面的，对于其他学科不了解，此处仅仅是提供一些本领域最基本的东西，希望能够对大家有所帮助。 不全之处，下次再补。 [ Last edited by shwh on 2006-5-8 at 13:33 ] |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 期刊甄别与讨论 |
» 猜你喜欢
论文终于录用啦！满足毕业条件了
已经有21人回复
-
不自信的我
已经有5人回复
-
磺酰氟产物，毕不了业了！
已经有4人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的杂志（返修），总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
0.25
 |
4楼2006-02-14 12:36:46