24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (3725)
>虫友互识 (614)
>文献求助 (214)
>休闲灌水 (213)
>导师招生 (198)
>考博 (129)
>论文投稿 (118)
>博后之家 (90)
>硕博家园 (81)
>招聘信息布告栏 (71)
>论文道贺祈福 (68)
>基金申请 (57)
>教师之家 (49)
>考研 (47)
>找工作 (45)
>公派出国 (21)

返回列表

当前主题已经存档。

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

shyh2009

木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 14 (小学生)
金币: 3809.7
散金: 8115
红花: 14
沙发: 1
帖子: 1552
在线: 589.6小时
虫号: 835322
注册: 2009-08-27
性别: GG
专业: 应用数学方法

[交流] 文章大修，给了3个月期限，大概多久投修改稿合适？

23/10 2009  submitted
4/11 2009 with editor
20/11 2009 under review
1/2 2010  required reviewers completed
4/2 2010  decision in process
4/2 2010 major revision
修改意见中，一位审稿人意见比较大，第二位审稿人则评价还不错。
审稿人态度如下：
Reviewer #1:  By using a special binary function Beta, the paper defines a pair of approximation operators in the fuzzy environment. Some basic properties of the operators are examined, which are similar to those of the existing fuzzy approximation operators. For two different kinds of approximation operators, the paper introduces two roughness measures and discusses a property.
The main difference of the definition of the proposed approximation operators from the original one is the Beta function. But, the authors do not explain why they use this function, and I wonder the advantage of the use of Beta operator.
Since the idea, results and proofs are parallel to the literature, this simple extension is not worth being published if there is no a good explanation.

.......................
..............省略

Reviewer #2: The idea of submitted paper is very interesting. The article is well written. The results obtained seem significant.

However, there exist in the paper some errors and mistakes:

.....................省略

大家帮忙给些建议，接受的希望有大吗？我大概提交修改稿合适呢？

回复此楼