| 查看: 387 | 回复: 4 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ,点击这里进行查看 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
文章的句话修改
|
|||
|
有几句话自己不会修改,请大家帮忙! 1.The influence of the former may be exactly offsite by that of latter, thus resulting the almost unchanged Tg. 我想说的前者的作用(影响)刚好被后者抵消,导致Tg几乎没有发生变化两者的影响几乎相同,导致玻璃化转变温度Tg几乎没有发生变化 2.The hardly increased crosslink density of R1.4 cannot compensate the influence of the reduced Xc. R1.4 交联密度增加很少,这就很难补偿结晶度Xc下降带来的力学性能的损失 3.Nevertheless, in this system, the crosslink density is not considered to be a chief parameter for degradation since the increase in crosslink density is companied by a decrease in the Xc(结晶度). |
» 猜你喜欢
极限拉扯,如何抉择
已经有15人回复
申请科研项目纯靠实力能成功吗?
已经有8人回复
中科院海洋所招收海洋材料相关领域博士研究生及研究助理
已经有4人回复
40+中年人失业后,还能找到好工作吗?
已经有3人回复
二审4个多月了还是Awaiting Reviewer Scores
已经有4人回复
OpenAI又攻克数学难题了,离AI做有机合成还有多远?
已经有13人回复
课题组会帮你通过考核么?
已经有7人回复
入职后第一次管课题组的专利缴费,对账才发现官费比别人多掏了一倍
已经有6人回复
售一区SCI文章T0P,我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有9人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有10人回复
money4u
至尊木虫 (著名写手)
- 翻译EPI: 26
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 12804.8
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 1773
- 在线: 107.6小时
- 虫号: 425515
- 注册: 2007-07-27
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 物理学I
yuepeiiccas(金币+1):谢了 2010-04-01 17:26
yuepeiiccas(金币+1):谢谢 2010-04-01 19:55
yuepeiiccas(金币+1):谢谢 2010-04-01 19:55
|
1.As the influence on Tg by the former may exactly be offset by that of the latter, Tg kept almost unchanged. 2.The small increase of R1.4 crosslink density Hardly can compensate the influence of reduced Xc on mechanical performances. 3.Nevertheless, in this system, crosslink density is not considered to be a chief factor for the degradation as the increase of crosslink density is always companied by a decrease of Xc. |

4楼2010-02-03 18:38:06
charleygan
至尊木虫 (著名写手)
chlgan
- 翻译EPI: 99
- 应助: 496 (硕士)
- 贵宾: 0.005
- 金币: 13167.2
- 散金: 15
- 红花: 44
- 帖子: 2396
- 在线: 399.5小时
- 虫号: 859768
- 注册: 2009-09-29
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 应用高分子化学与物理
yuepeiiccas(金币+1):谢了 2010-04-01 17:26
|
1.The influence of the first factor on Tg exactly offset by that of the second one, thus resulting in almost unchanged Tg. 2.The little increase in crosslink density of R1.4 cannot compensate the lose in mechanical properties resulted from the reduced Xc. 3.Nevertheless, in this system, the crosslink density is not considered to be a key factor for degradation since the increase in crosslink density is companied by a decrease in the Xc. 供参考。 |
3楼2010-02-03 10:58:35
lengbingyu
金虫 (小有名气)
- 翻译EPI: 1
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 537.6
- 帖子: 272
- 在线: 42分钟
- 虫号: 948501
- 注册: 2010-01-25
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 英语语言学
yuepeiiccas(金币+1):谢了、 2010-04-01 17:27
|
.个人感觉,这句话的中文有问题啊,两个因素的作用相互抵消,但是不能说明两个因素的影响是相同的啊,不知你想表达的意思,如果是后者可译为:The influences of these two factors on Tg have little difference, which results in an nearly unchanged Tg. 2.The tiny increasement of crosslink density of R1.4 cannot compensate the loss of mechanical properties caused by the reduce of Xc. 3.Nevertheless, in this system, the crosslink density can not be considered as the main parameter causing degradation since the increase in the crosslink density is alway companied by the decrease in the Xc(结晶度). |

5楼2010-02-05 16:46:49










回复此楼
200