| ²é¿´: 558 | »Ø¸´: 7 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
huxiuling½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
¸ºÔðµÄ±à¼
|
||
|
È¥ÄêÎåÔ·ÝͶµÄ¸å£¬Ò»Ö±Ã»ÓÐÐÅÏ¢£¬ÎÒҲûȥ¹ÜËü£¬Ò²Ã»Óд߸塣ǰ¼¸ÌìͻȻÊÕµ½±à¼µÄÀ´ÐÅÎÒ²ÅÖªµÀÔÀ´ÕâÆªÎÄÕ¾¹È»ÓÐ13¸öÉó¸åÈËûÓлØÓ¦£¬±à¼·¢ÐÅÀ´µÀǸ¡£Õ渺Ô𣡠Dear ***, I wanted to write and apologise for the delay in processing a decision on your paper. As you know, we require two peer reviews before making a decision on a submission. In your case it has been unusually difficult to find reviewers: we have sent out invitations on five separate occasions, to a total of thirteen reviewers. This is no reflection on your work, but rather that the reviewers have been unable to commit the time. We do now have one review complete, and I invited another referee yesterday. I hope we will be able to progress with a decision soon. I do apologise for the unfortunate delay, but rest assured I am doing everything I can to move your paper through the system! Kind regards, *** Journals Assistant Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Mathematical Institute 24¨C29 St Giles¡¯ Oxford OX1 3LB ÒѽÓÊÜ£¬ºÇºÇ¡£ [ Last edited by huxiuling on 2010-6-23 at 10:07 ] |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
»·¾³×¨Ë¶µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ23È˻ظ´
301Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
304Çóµ÷¼Á£¨085602£¬¹ýËļ¶£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸985£©
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
302·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á Ò»Ö¾Ô¸°²»Õ´óѧ085601
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
288»·¾³×¨Ë¶,Çóµ÷²ÄÁÏ·½Ïò
ÒѾÓÐ23È˻ظ´
22408 µ÷¼Á²ÄÁÏ
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
285Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
085600²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤301·ÖÇóµ÷¼ÁԺУ
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
rfxu
½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1031
- Ìû×Ó: 1017
- ÔÚÏß: 6.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 809123
- ×¢²á: 2009-07-14
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¸ß·Ö×Ó»¯Ñ§ÓëÎïÀí,²ÄÁÏ»¯Ñ§
8Â¥2010-02-03 17:52:13














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥