24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前主题已经存档。

simple2007

银虫 (著名写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 33.5
散金: 235
红花: 6
帖子: 1862
在线: 193.4小时
虫号: 314804
注册: 2007-02-25
性别: GG
专业: 群落生态学

[交流] 【分享】应用较广的几个土壤侵蚀模型

Introduction
6-1 Tolerable soil loss
6-2 The universal soil loss equation (USLE)
6-3 Revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE)
6-4 Computer-based soil loss prediction models
6-5 The wind-erosion prediction equation (WEQ)
6-6 Expanded use of the wind-erosion prediction equation
6-7 Revised wind erosion equation (RWEQ)
6-8 The wind erosion prediction system (WEPS)
Summary

Introduction
1. It is necessary to evaluate erosion loss
2. In 1930s, Soil Conservation Service began to assess
3. Prediction equations for water and wind erosion
4. Equations are revised

6-1 Tolerable soil loss
1. Soil loss tolerance: the maximum level of soil erosion that will permit a high level
of crop productivity to be sustained economically and indefinitely (Smith, 1978)
2. Soil loss tolerance (T): 1-5 tons/ ac-yr
3. Depends on many factors

6-2 The universal soil loss equation (USLE)
1. USLE: Wischmeier and Smith (1965)
A = R x K x LS x C x P
(1) rainfall and runoff factor (R): R = EI30
total energy (E) and the maximum 30- minute intensity (I30) (Table 6-1)
(2) soil erodibility factor (K)
(3) slope length and steepness factor (LS)
(4) cover-management factor (C)
(5) supporting-practice factor (P)
a. contour cultivation
b. contour strip cropping
c. terraces
2. Acceptance of the USLE
(1) use spread in US, need adjustments
(2) overestimate or underestimate
3. Modified USLE
(1) modified version (Wischmeier and Smith, 1978): for sheet and rill erosion,
not for gully erosion
(2) R values: excluding Alaska
(3) K values: 5 parameters (fig. 6-1, Table 6-2)
a. %silt + very fine sand
b. % other sand
c. % organic matter
d. structure
e. permeability
(4) LS values: changed slightly
(5) C values: six periods (Table 6-3)
(6) P values: terracing was changed
4. Acceptance of the modified USLE
(1) tested in many countries, Kenya, Iraq, …
(2) show some significant weaknesses
(3) USDA-ARS decided, in 1985, to develop the revised universal soil loss
equation (RUSLE)

6-3 Revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE)
1. Changes made in revising USLE
(1) for personal computer use
(2) R factor: fig. 6-2
(3) K, LS, C, P changed (Table 6-4)
2.release and acceptance of RUSLE
(1) released in 1992
(2) half the conservation districts in US used RUSLE in 1997
3. Training NRCS personnel to use RUSLE
(1) ARS negotiated an agreement with SWCS in 1992
(2) SWCS accepted responsibility
4. Updating RUSLE
(1) analyzed more data and modified the software
(2) RUSLE version 2.0 for Windows
5. Predicting soil losses caused by water erosion- a specific example
(1) Marshall , southwestern Iowa
a. R: 170 (fig. 6-2)
b. K: silt loam, K=0.26 (Table 6-5)
c. LS: 8%, 250-ft, LS=1.62 (Table 6-6B)
d. C: corn after, spring primary tillage, plow, C=0.20 (Table 6-7)
e. P: no special practices, P=1.0
A =170x0.26x1.62x0.20x1.0=14.3 tons/ac-yr
(2) T=5 tons/ac-yr, (Table 6-2), must reduce soil erosion
a. C: increase cover, C=0.11
b. P: contour cultivation, P=0.61 (Table, 6-8, 6-9, 6-10)
A =170x0.26x1.62x0.11x0.61=4.8 tons/ac-yr < =5 tons/ac-yr
c. P =PcxPsxPt =0.61x1.0x0.6 =0.37 (Table 6-11)
A =170x0.26x1.62x0.11x0.37=3.4 tons/ac-yr

6-4 Computer-based soil loss prediction models
1. Soil loss prediction for special purposes
(1) ANSWERS (Aerial Non-point Environmental Response Simulation): Beasley
et al. (1980) developed
(2) CREAMS (Chemicals, Runoff, and Erosion from Agricultural Management):
by ARS scientists (Knisel, 1980)
(3) EPIC (Erosion Productivity Impact Calculator): ARS scientists (Williams et
al., 1983)
(4) AGNPS (Agricultural Non-Point Source): Young et al. (1989)
(5) CAMPS (Computer-Assisted Management and Planning System): SCS
developed
2. Process-based soil loss prediction equations
(1) WEPP (Water Erosion Prediction Project): not based on USLE equation,
ARS, NRCS, FS, USDA involved
(2) EUROSEM (European Soil Erosion Model): Morgan and Rickson, 1994
(3) GUEST (Griffith University Erosion System Template): Misra and Rose,
1996
(4) LISEM (Limburg Soil Erosion Model): Netherlands in 1996 (Jetten et al.)

6-5 The wind-erosion prediction equation (WEQ)
1. Components of the WEQ
E = f(I’, K’, C’, L’, V)
(1) I’: soil erodibility factor (Table 6-12)
(2) K’: soil-ridge-roughness factor (Table 6-13)
(3) C’: climatic factor (Note 6-1, fig. 6-4)
(4) L’: width-of-field factor (Table 6-14)
(5)V: vegetative-cover factor (fig. 6-6, 6-7)
2. Predicting soil losses caused by wind erosion- a specific example
3. Field use of the wind-erosion prediction equation (Table 6-15)
4. Predicting wind erosion for crop periods

6-6 Expanded use of the wind-erosion prediction equation
1. Use on cultivated soil in humid regions in the United States
2. Use on rangeland in western United States
3. Use of the WEQ to predict air pollution
4. Use of the equation in other countries and continents
5. Upgrading the wind-erosion equation

6-7 Revised wind erosion equation (RWEQ)
1. Climatic variables: wind velocity, rainfall, temperature, solar radiation
2. Surface-soil properties: soil erodibility, soiloriented roughness, soil random
roughness
3. Integrated into GIS

6-8 The wind erosion prediction system (WEPS)
1. Process-based: in 1991
(1) 7 submodels: hydrology, management, soil, crop, decomposition, erosion,
weather
(2) 4 databases: climate, soil, management, crop/decomposition
2. Estimates soil movement, plant abrasion damage, emissions of dust

Summary
1. Erosion cannot be prevented, but it must be limited to tolerable rates
2. USLE and RUSLE: water erosion prediction
A = R x K x LS x C x P
3. WEQ: wind erosion prediction
E = f(I’, K’, C’, L’, V)

[ Last edited by simple2007 on 2010-1-23 at 20:32 ]

回复此楼