24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 639  |  回复: 11
当前主题已经存档。
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

halehit

金虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 大家是否碰到过这种情况?

第一个审稿人没意见
第二个审稿人认为我的文章没有科学性,没有达到该刊物所需的发表水平。
编辑(主编)说他通篇看了我的稿子,并不赞成第二个审稿人的意见,但建议我进行大量的小修。
邮件如下
Manuscript ID ***** entitled "**********" which you submitted to the Journal of ***********, has been reviewed.  The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter.

The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some minor revisions to your manuscript.  Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript.


Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:

Reviewer: 1
Comments to the Author
(There are no comments)

Reviewer: 2
Comments to the Author
In the ********, mere measurement and finite element simulation were carried out. The present paper lacks scientific contribution, and the present paper is not on acceptable levels for the publication of the journal.


Editor's Note:

I looked through your manuscript and disagree with Reviewer 2. However, I noticed a number of minor errors,  such as using both "a" and "the" to describe the same noun.

If I were to suggest one thing, it would be to include slightly bette r ******* structure. Other than that you might read through your paper again to catch the minor errors and to see if there are sections that could be strengthened with more comprehensive discussion.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yw__577

金虫 (文坛精英)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
编辑很负责,有些编辑压根不看,只要评语里有一些他认为reject的字眼就立马否掉了
这个基本接收了,就是些语法问题了
5楼2010-01-23 03:22:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 12 个回答

halehit

金虫 (正式写手)

请问一下,修改稿是否还会给第二个审稿人看?这样的情况,最后被接受的可能性有多大?
2楼2010-01-23 02:24:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhangwei_cug

银虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
很正常,你按照编辑的意思改就是了,最终决定是否录用的是他。
3楼2010-01-23 02:25:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ztlccbj

木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
恭喜,肯定收了。
4楼2010-01-23 02:29:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见