| ²é¿´: 2911 | »Ø¸´: 37 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
jlcÒ¹ÓêÒø³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
chemosͶ¸å2¸öÔ£¬decision in process,±¾ß¡£ ÒÑÓÐ6È˲ÎÓë
|
||
|
11ÔÂ21ºÅͶµÄ£¬Öмäunder reviewÖ®ºó²»¶à¾Ã±ä³Éreviewers invited,³ÖÐøÁ˺ܾã¬Ò²Ã»Ôõôȥ¹Ü£¬¸ÕÉÏÈ¥¿´À´±ä³Édecision in processÁË£¬»ù±¾Éϱ¾ß¡£ ÕâÆªÎÄÕÂÖÊÁ¿²»ÊÇÌ«¸ß£¬µ±Ê±Í¶Õâ¸ö¿¯ÎïÖ÷ÒªÊÇÏëŪµãÐ޸ĵÄÒâ¼û£¬Ï£ÍûÄÜÓÐÕâ·½ÃæµÄ°ïÖú°É¡£ [ Last edited by jlcÒ¹Óê on 2010-1-22 at 00:17 ] |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
304Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
²ÄÁϹ¤³Ìר˶µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Ìì´ó²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤£¨085600£©×Ü·Ö338
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
085700×ÊÔ´Óë»·¾³308Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
Çó²ÄÁϵ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
294Çóµ÷¼Á²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤×¨Ë¶
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÖпƼ¼´óѧ£¬080502£¬354·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸¼ªÁÖ´óѧ²ÄÁÏѧ˶321Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
085410È˹¤ÖÇÄÜר˶317Çóµ÷¼Á£¨0854¶¼¿ÉÒÔ£©
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
330Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
ÎÄÕÂ״̬ decision in processÒѾ6Ì죬Ҫ²»Òª´ßһϱ༣¿
ÒѾÓÐ22È˻ظ´
ÎÄÕ´óÐÞºó£¬decision in process ¶¼°ë¸öÔÂÁË£¬»¹Ã»ÏûÏ¢£¡
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
Decision in ProcessÒѾÈý¸öÔÂÁË£¬É¢¾¡È«²¿½ð±ÒÇó×£¸££¡
ÒѾÓÐ163È˻ظ´
Decision in Process ÕâÊÇʲôÒâ˼°¡
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
Ͷ¸åappl catal a, 20ÌìÁË£¬»¹decision in process£¬Õ¦»ØÊÂ
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
ÓйشóÐÞºódecision in processµÄÎÊÌâ
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
Ö±½ÓDECISION IN PROCESS£¬²»ÖªµÀÔõô»ØÊ°¡£¿
ÒѾÓÐ175È˻ظ´
Required reviews completed µ½decision in process²Å°ëÌìÊDz»ÊDZ¾ßÁË
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
decision in process 2¸öÔÂÁË
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Ͷ¸å5Ìì״̬±ä³Édecision in process
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ÍâÉóºódecision in processÒѾһ¸öÔ£¬Õ¦°ì£¿
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
2Éódecision in process
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
Elsevier Éó¸å״̬ Decision in process 2¸öÔÂ
ÒѾÓÐ43È˻ظ´
jlcÒ¹Óê
Òø³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 576.5
- É¢½ð: 1069
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 2200
- ÔÚÏß: 185.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 406253
- ×¢²á: 2007-06-18
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¿óÒ±Éú̬Óë»·¾³¹¤³Ì
3Â¥2010-01-22 00:21:55
djjwan
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 9 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 14607.8
- É¢½ð: 665
- ºì»¨: 4
- Ìû×Ó: 1008
- ÔÚÏß: 418.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 914397
- ×¢²á: 2009-11-27
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ´óÆø»¯Ñ§
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
jlcÒ¹Óê(½ð±Ò+5,VIP+0):½èÐֵܼªÑÔ°¡£¡£¡¶àл£¡ÊÇСÐÞ 1-22 00:28
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
jlcÒ¹Óê(½ð±Ò+5,VIP+0):½èÐֵܼªÑÔ°¡£¡£¡¶àл£¡ÊÇСÐÞ 1-22 00:28
|
¾ö¶¨»¹Ã»³öÀ´°¡ ÄãÔõô¾Í¶Ï¶¨±¾ßÁ˰¡ ¿ÉÄÜÊǺÃÏûÏ¢°¡ |
2Â¥2010-01-22 00:19:16
jlcÒ¹Óê
Òø³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 576.5
- É¢½ð: 1069
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 2200
- ÔÚÏß: 185.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 406253
- ×¢²á: 2007-06-18
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¿óÒ±Éú̬Óë»·¾³¹¤³Ì
|
ÈËÆ·´ó±¬·¢ÁË£¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£¡ ¸Õ¸ÕÓʼþ£¬¾¹È»ÊÇminor revision£¡£¡£¡£¡ Dear Dr. I can now inform you that the reviewer and editor have evaluated the manuscript "¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£" (Dr. ¡£¡£¡£¡£). I am pleased to say that it has been favourably received and publication with minor revision is recommended ¡£ I look forward with interest to receipt of the modified version. You should explain how and where each point of the reviewer's and Editor's comments has been incorporated. For this, use submission item "Revision Notes" when uploading your revision. Also, indicate the changes in an annotated version of the revised manuscript (submission item "Revision, changes marked" . Should you disagree with any part of the reviews, please explain why.[ Last edited by jlcÒ¹Óê on 2010-1-22 at 00:31 ] |
4Â¥2010-01-22 00:27:16
djjwan
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 9 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 14607.8
- É¢½ð: 665
- ºì»¨: 4
- Ìû×Ó: 1008
- ÔÚÏß: 418.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 914397
- ×¢²á: 2009-11-27
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ´óÆø»¯Ñ§
5Â¥2010-01-22 00:31:09













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
. Should you disagree with any part of the reviews, please explain why.