24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 794  |  回复: 7
当前主题已经存档。

wuhaigufan

新虫 (小有名气)

[交流] 大家帮忙看看material and design的回复

前一段投了个文章,昨天收到回复,投稿系统的状态时rivise,编辑也没提什么具体问题,似乎是说介绍部分要引用更多的参考文献,结论部分要重写?不知道理解对不对?各位给点意见,看接受的可能怎么样,
The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form.
However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript.

Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments.
If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also:
a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments
AND/OR
b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed
To submit your revision, please do the following:
......

When submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word). Uploading only a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication.  If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them.

I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Yours sincerely,

K.L. Edwards
Editor in Chief
Materials and Design

Reviewers' comments:
The introduction needs to include more references of this area. The conclusion is also poor and needs to be rewritten, making the outcomes of the research more explicite.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

无著心

木虫 (著名写手)

2楼2010-01-21 10:47:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wumin1283

银虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
在introduction部分需要更多的参考文献,在conclusion部分需要重写,清晰研究结果。
好好修改,一定会接收的!
3楼2010-01-21 10:49:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

haihe

木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
引用回帖:
Originally posted by wumin1283 at 2010-1-21 10:49:
在introduction部分需要更多的参考文献,在conclusion部分需要重写,清晰研究结果。
好好修改,一定会接收的!

希望很大,好好修改!
4楼2010-01-21 11:10:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wuhaigufan

新虫 (小有名气)

谢谢各位指点,另外,introduction部分是仅仅多添加一些参考文献呢(比如本来引用1篇参考文献,再增加引用2篇类似文献),还是整个文本内容都要增加?其他部分比如material and method 和results and disscusion部分还需要修改吗?新手问题比较菜,多谢

[ Last edited by wuhaigufan on 2010-1-21 at 11:20 ]
5楼2010-01-21 11:15:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

clj366

木虫 (正式写手)

好好修改,问题不大!
沧海一粟
6楼2010-01-21 11:26:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wumin1283

银虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
好好改改,最好是重新整合一下内容。其他部分最好也看看,如果自己能找出更多问题审稿人会很欣赏的。
7楼2010-01-21 12:03:44
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

pouth

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

大修 还不算太坏 按要求修好吧
有所不为有所为;有所为有所不为;行胜于言!
8楼2010-01-21 13:02:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 wuhaigufan 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见