| 查看: 293 | 回复: 2 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
xanderzhang木虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
et al. vs etc. 你知道怎么用吗?
|
||
|
The term "et al." is an abbreviation for the Latin term et aliae that means and others, the others being people and not things. It is affixed after the name of a person, e.g., a researcher to indicate that additional people were involved in the work or were acting in the same manner. For example, in the sentence "The work was completed by Shimazu et al.," the term et al. indicates that Shimazu and others (his co-workers or colleagues) were involved in completing the work. On the other hand, the word etc, the abbreviation of et cetera, means and the rest or and so forth. It is used at the end of a list to indicate that the list is not complete and only some of the involved items have been mentioned. Further, when a list is introduced using "such as" or "e.g.," the use of the term "etc" is redundant. Example Incorrect: It was reported that some metal ions such as zinc, copper, and vanadium, et al. were useful in the therapy for diabetes mellitus. Correct: It was reported that some metal ions such as zinc, copper, and vanadium were useful in the therapy for diabetes mellitus. Also Correct: Zinc, copper, vanadium, etc. were the metal ions reported to be useful in the therapy for diabetes mellitus. In the above example, since the reference is being made to elements and not people the use of the term et al. is incorrect. |
» 猜你喜欢
小木虫看见有人已经知道结果了
已经有18人回复
2026年国自然面上资助率
已经有8人回复
系统今天又提示维护了,估计离放榜不远了
已经有15人回复
微信指数没变化,科研之友没阅读
已经有17人回复
申请2027年材料/化学类博士
已经有5人回复
你们的时间戳变了吗
已经有4人回复
今年的WR进展到哪一步了?
已经有9人回复
产物和副产物价值比较
已经有5人回复
时间戳他又来了
已经有17人回复
这个自发加氧反应的机理是什么?
已经有7人回复
visitor958
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
IEEE杂志与会议专家
- 应助: 2283 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.05
- 金币: 17310.5
- 散金: 2544
- 红花: 76
- 帖子: 15735
- 在线: 2926.6小时
- 虫号: 489254
- 注册: 2008-01-01
- 专业: IEEE
2楼2010-01-19 23:21:42
antiq
木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 4109.6
- 散金: 6862
- 红花: 5
- 帖子: 5563
- 在线: 690.2小时
- 虫号: 760200
- 注册: 2009-04-29
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 计算数学与科学工程计算
3楼2010-01-19 23:26:40










回复此楼