24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (3591)
>导师招生 (436)
>文献求助 (374)
>休闲灌水 (294)
>虫友互识 (136)
>考博 (123)
>招聘信息布告栏 (92)
>论文道贺祈福 (88)
>硕博家园 (84)
>公派出国 (77)
>博后之家 (75)
>论文投稿 (75)
>基金申请 (63)
>教师之家 (59)
>考研 (41)
>找工作 (35)

返回列表

当前主题已经存档。

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

wangyuhui8538

金虫 (小有名气)

应助: 2 (幼儿园)
金币: 1008.6
散金: 20
红花: 1
帖子: 196
在线: 139.1小时
虫号: 721410
注册: 2009-03-13
专业: 结构工程

[交流] 大家帮我看看，这个回复，谢了

回复如下：

Dear Mr. ,

Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision.

For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below.

If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript.

Revision within 3 months is encouraged to expedite our review process.
……

Yours sincerely

Editor-in-Chief

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1:

See attached file for detailed comments.

Reviewer #3: …… On the whole, the article is written well and feasible. However, the authors have not emphasized the importance of ……. Thus, the usefulness of …… should be described in the article. I suggest that this article could be recommended for being published in this journal.

大家帮我看看，这个回复是什么意思？文章被接受概率大不大？另外，为什么只给出了Reviewer #1和Reviewer #3的意见，没有Reviewer #2的意见，是什么原因？

[ Last edited by wangyuhui8538 on 2010-1-19 at 10:23 ]

回复此楼