| 查看: 370 | 回复: 3 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
songshu310金虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
虫子们看看这样能和editor argument么？
|
||
|
Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript entitled "******" for publication in ****. All articles are first screened by an appropriate editor to ensure the topic is of general interest to our readers, that only purified chemicals of known structure are examined in the study, and to judge the potential impact of the findings relative to those described in other manuscripts under consideration. Following this initial review the submissions are prioritized. Those ranked highest are sent to experts in the field who review the report and render written judgments with regard to experimental design, the method of data acquisition, data analyses and interpretation. The purpose of this correspondence is to inform you that your manuscript did not receive a priority sufficient to qualify for further review. Accordingly, it will receive no further consideration for publication in the journal. I certainly appreciate being given the opportunity to publish this work, and look forward to receiving future submissions from you and your group. Sincerely, 昨晚投的，20分钟后被拒，从上文看出主要是由于认为只有化学结构清楚的 才考虑进入后续审稿。我们的材料结构已经研究很清楚，而且还有质谱结果。但因为以前发表过，所以文中只引用并没详述 虫子们看看这种情况和editor argument有可能让他重新考虑么？ 着急 在线等哈~ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
职称评审没过，求安慰
已经有41人回复
-
回收溶剂求助
已经有7人回复
-
硝基苯如何除去
已经有3人回复
-
A期刊撤稿
已经有4人回复
-
垃圾破二本职称评审标准
已经有17人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的Neoplasia杂志，到最后选publishing options时页面空白，不能完成投稿
已经有22人回复
-
EST投稿状态问题
已经有7人回复
-
毕业后当辅导员了，天天各种学生超烦
已经有4人回复
-
求助文献
已经有3人回复
-
三无产品还有机会吗
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关商家推荐: (我也要在这里推广)
yinhuanshun
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 110 (高中生)
- 金币: 14055.2
- 散金: 3565
- 红花: 11
- 帖子: 5154
- 在线: 375.4小时
- 虫号: 200018
- 注册: 2006-02-27
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 生化分析及生物传感
4楼2010-01-19 13:15:29
虎三
铁杆木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 8004.7
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 351
- 在线: 101.4小时
- 虫号: 642900
- 注册: 2008-11-01
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 能源化工
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
|
The purpose of this correspondence is to inform you that your manuscript did not receive a priority sufficient to qualify for further review. Accordingly, it will receive no further consideration for publication in the journal. 这句话已经明确说明了你的文章不能被接收，所以还是建议楼主改投其他的吧 |
2楼2010-01-19 11:30:10