24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1348  |  回复: 15
当前主题已经存档。

feitian1984

银虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 大家帮我看看我这篇文章中的几率有多大

大家好,有没有那位投过亚洲地学杂志(Journal of Asian Earth Sciences)?我投了一篇,审了快一年才审回。终于审回来了,审稿意见是:

The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form.
However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript.
Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments.
If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also:
a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments
   AND/OR
b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed
To submit your revision, please do the following:******

Reviewers' comments:
This paper deals with *******. The two reviewers agreed that this paper merits publication at the Journal of Asian Earth Sciences. Nevertheless, vital revisions are necessary to improve the manuscript for a publishable condition. These comments would surely be very useful to the authors to extensively improve their manuscript.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript by ***makes an important contribution to better understand the ******, by using the technique of ******.
The ******have been found in fine-grained mudstone, shale or chalk only in Cretaceous and Cenozoic basins. The system was first recognized in Upper Miocene in the deep water zone in South China Sea with high quality 3D seismic data using seismic attributes.
DETAILED COMMENTS
******

Reviewer #3: The manuscript titled "******" by ****** documents the findings of a 3D seismic cube which shows ******within some particular horizons, which they argue may serve as the pathway linking the source rocks and reservoir.  Overall the dataset is interesting and worth publishing.  However, there are some major concerns:
1.    ******2. ******3.   *****
4.   ******
There are some minor comments:
******
In sum, the manuscript needs modification before it is ready for publication.  Using the geometric information of the******imaged by this study, the authors have made interesting observations and proposal important interpretation.  On the other hand, it will be good to use additional information to better support the discussion about the formation and implications of the ******.  The authors have good command of English, but there are still many loose-ends in the manuscript that they can work on during the revision.  The seismic data look great, and it will be great to make this manuscript more process-oriented so similar work can be applied in other regions.
以上是两个审稿人的审稿意见。
各位过来的高人,指点一下,这篇文章的中的几率高吗?这个杂志太慢了,我怕修改后又要好长的时间,要是被拒了,就太悲剧了。请路过,知道的一定不惜赐教啊,先谢谢各位虫虫了。

[ Last edited by feitian1984 on 2010-1-18 at 17:36 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

feitian1984

银虫 (正式写手)

另外,I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript.编辑的这句话是不是意味着要重新投,重新找审稿人,又要经历漫长的周期了?
2楼2010-01-18 17:14:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wxchen326

银虫 (小有名气)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
感觉是,要大修,然后再投
3楼2010-01-18 17:20:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sanshyuan

捐助贵宾 (著名写手)



小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
大修。有机会。好好修改!
4楼2010-01-18 17:22:44
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

feitian1984

银虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by wxchen326 at 2010-1-18 17:20:
感觉是,要大修,然后再投

先谢谢了,感觉希望大吗?
5楼2010-01-18 17:22:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

feitian1984

银虫 (正式写手)

请路过的明白的虫虫,一定要帮忙啊
6楼2010-01-18 17:37:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

gvvsx200

金虫 (小有名气)

这个周期就长咯... 等于是一切重头开始.
当然把审稿人的意见好好做一做, 投一个更好的都有可能.
7楼2010-01-18 18:23:40
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

燕孤鸿

金虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
大修,机会较大
The two reviewers agreed that this paper merits publication at the Journal of Asian Earth Sciences
人若无名,便可专心
8楼2010-01-18 18:28:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

feitian1984

银虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by gvvsx200 at 2010-1-18 18:23:
这个周期就长咯... 等于是一切重头开始.
当然把审稿人的意见好好做一做, 投一个更好的都有可能.

哦,这么惨啊,有些犹豫了
9楼2010-01-18 19:11:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

feitian1984

银虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by 燕孤鸿 at 2010-1-18 18:28:
大修,机会较大
The two reviewers agreed that this paper merits publication at the Journal of Asian Earth Sciences

谢谢燕孤鸿了。这个杂志的周期太长了,有点让人受不了
10楼2010-01-18 19:12:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 feitian1984 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 今日不放榜?网传国自然预计 8 月 27 日可查结果 +15 医学老男孩 2026-08-20 19/950 2026-08-21 18:54 by 医学老男孩
[基金申请] 看来今天不会放榜了? +8 chengyan1220 2026-08-21 11/550 2026-08-21 17:52 by dcqxinyang
[基金申请] 时间戳又变了 +13 wuchongjun 2026-08-20 19/950 2026-08-21 17:21 by 紫杉醇
[基金申请] filecode,4个jtjc了 +11 ziyangfang 2026-08-19 14/700 2026-08-21 16:51 by applepetty
[基金申请] 让我中一个面上吧! +11 大萍1987 2026-08-20 13/650 2026-08-21 14:48 by 20120902066
[基金申请] 感觉是下周放榜了 +7 angus9576 2026-08-17 12/600 2026-08-21 13:38 by weiyin
[基金申请] 只有每年这种时候来逛逛小木虫 +23 yaoyewhu2008 2026-08-20 25/1250 2026-08-21 12:19 by Poppy1104
[基金申请] 什么时候开奖? +7 CrisMessi 2026-08-18 7/350 2026-08-21 12:15 by weiyin
[基金申请] 时间戳又变了8-15 +15 archvillain 2026-08-15 27/1350 2026-08-21 11:32 by tim76
[基金申请] 应该是下周三26日公布了吧? +4 哈哈蛤? 2026-08-21 4/200 2026-08-21 10:58 by Vivilian
[论文投稿] 投稿咨询 +5 wwm09 2026-08-17 7/350 2026-08-21 10:11 by 期刊论文帮手
[基金申请] 放榜前的不淡定 40+4 snowwithsea 2026-08-19 13/650 2026-08-21 08:30 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 估计是周四 +3 archvillain 2026-08-18 3/150 2026-08-21 01:48 by jnhyjjm
[基金申请] 今天系统多次维护,明天很可能放榜! +10 zju2000 2026-08-16 11/550 2026-08-20 20:02 by cl479861084
[教师之家] 为什么余额宝的年化利率越来越低?主要原因有哪些? +5 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-15 5/250 2026-08-19 20:23 by super2002521
[基金申请] 今天放榜吗? +14 布布和一二 2026-08-19 15/750 2026-08-19 18:07 by gltch
[基金申请] 2027广东省杰青 +4 奶牛小黑 2026-08-15 10/500 2026-08-19 11:02 by wanfengnew
[基金申请] 明天放榜? +5 Shxjjxjkx 2026-08-18 5/250 2026-08-18 18:14 by -大大大大大-
[基金申请] 今天维护系统维护 祝所有人 高中 +8 gjjjzhong 2026-08-18 9/450 2026-08-18 13:01 by 家与远方
[基金申请] 93BebMhtakh前后11位开头都是大写 +4 且听虎啸 2026-08-17 5/250 2026-08-18 00:49 by 蔡棒棒菂
信息提示
请填处理意见