| 查看: 503 | 回复: 6 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
dfy1972金虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
如何处理拒稿人的意见
|
||
|
刚收到文章的审稿意见，如下： Reviewer #1: In this manuscript, the author synthesized a xxx complex, xxx. Some means including elemental analysis, FI-IR spectrum and single-crystal X-ray diffraction are used to characterize this complex. The provided data are seemingly logical. However, the simple design and experiment do not appear enough for xxxx. The quality of this manuscript can not meet the basic requirement of xxxx. The simple experiments and characterizations are not enough to cover the claimed opinions. Personally, I feel this manuscript will be suitable for the journal of Acta Cryst. E. In conclusion, I do not recommend this manuscript for xxxx. Reviewer #2: 评价很高，They are more stylistic mannerisms than substantive errors, and even add a certain charm to the paper - your editors could easily correct them, but they could also be left as they are. Reviewer #3: All-in-all, I think the paper is acceptable. My recommendation is to give in-depth discussion for a full paper. To be sure, the English grammar needs much work. 根据以上建议，编辑要求小修，请大虾指点，修改文章和回复信时，Reviewer #1:的意见如何处理啊？？？？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
拟解决的关键科学问题还要不要写
已经有8人回复
-
存款400万可以在学校里躺平吗
已经有24人回复
-
最失望的一年
已经有7人回复
-
推荐一本书
已经有16人回复
-
国自然申请面上模板最新2026版出了吗？
已经有20人回复
-
26申博
已经有3人回复
-
请教限项目规定
已经有3人回复
-
基金委咋了？2026年的指南还没有出来？
已经有10人回复
-
基金申报
已经有6人回复
-
疑惑？
已经有5人回复
quan3145
铁杆木虫 (文学泰斗)
博士
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 44530.4
- 散金: 3777
- 红花: 107
- 沙发: 10
- 帖子: 57739
- 在线: 624.7小时
- 虫号: 794207
- 注册: 2009-06-14
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 发育生物学
6楼2010-01-11 08:54:12
yensh
金虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 7.448
- 金币: 2333.1
- 散金: 18967
- 红花: 118
- 沙发: 677
- 帖子: 25063
- 在线: 1871.6小时
- 虫号: 446925
- 注册: 2007-10-28
- 专业: 未来学
2楼2010-01-11 08:08:11
3楼2010-01-11 08:12:12
4楼2010-01-11 08:13:11