| ²é¿´: 773 | »Ø¸´: 12 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
wxw1981_2001ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
°ïæ·ÖÎöÒ»ÏÂ
|
||
|
ͶµÄÒ»¸öÓ¢¹úÔÓÖ¾¸ÕÓлظ´£ºMajor revisions ÎÒÕâÊǵÚÒ»´ÎͶӢÎÄÎÄÕ£¬¸Ð¾õÊÇ´óÐÞ¡£È»ºó¸æËßÀϰ壬Àϰå˵±ðÈ˵ͼ²»ÕâÑù£¬Ôõôµ½ÄãÕâ¾Í´óÐÞÁËÄØ£¬ÎÒÔÎÁË£¬È»ºó»¹ÎÊ£ºÐÞÁËÖ®ºó»¹ÓÐǹ±ÐµÄ¿ÉÄÜÂð£¿ÎÒÔÙ´ÎÔΣ¡ ´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒ·ÖÎöһϣ¬ÎÒÊÇÐÞ¸ÄÄØ»¹ÊǸÄͶ£¿ ±à¼µÄÔ»°: Thank you for submitting this manuscript for consideration for publication in Food and Bioproducts Processing. We have now received referees' reports. Major revisions are required before the manuscript can be accepted for publication. I would be pleased to receive a revised version from you for further consideration. When submitting your revised manuscript, please respond to the comments made by the referees. In general, the language needs to be improved and it is strongly recommended that the manuscript be proofread by an English editor. In order to expedite the processing of the revised manuscript, please be as specific as possible in your response to the referees. We aim to facilitate timely publication of all manuscripts submitted to Food and Bioproducts Processing, so please submit your revised manuscript as soon as possible, and within four months at latest. If you require additional time to revise the manuscript, please e-mail the Editorial Office: sord@icheme.org ÆäÖÐÒ»¸öÆÀÔÄÈ˵ϰ£º General comments This manuscript will add to the knowledge of films based on carrot puree once a major revision was made. The academic and industrial interest of the subject is relevant and technical quality is acceptable regarding the preformed assays. However the presentation and the readability of the paper should be revised and improved. A physicochemical characterization of the carrot puree used in film formulations is required as well as a description about film appearance. Likewise, authors should consider to perform color analysis of developed films since this is a critical parameter that determine future film applications. In my opinion, the experiments performed have been carefully planned but the manuscript has been wrongly organized. Materials and Methods section has not been described in a proper form. Film formulation, which is the core of the paper, is not clear and according to this, readers would be disconcerted about the Results and Discussion section. Besides, as a reader, I expect a deep discussion of the obtained results. The literature cited is relevant and adequate. The statistical analysis performed was inobjectable and it was described in the main text and tables. Although, an explanation or hypothesis about statistical observations are required in order to improve the discussion of the obtained results. ºóÃæÊǾßÌåµÄÐÞ¸ÄÒâ¼û¡£ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÖÐũ΢ÉúÎ288·Ö£¬ÈýÄêʵÑé¾Àú
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
269Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
268·Ö085602»¯Ñ§¹¤³Ìµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
071000ÉúÎïѧµ÷¼ÁÇóÖú
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
296Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
297Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ25È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Öйú¿ÆÑ§ÔºÉϺ£ÓлúËù£¬Óлú»¯Ñ§356·ÖÕÒµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
367Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
086003µ÷¼ÁÇóÖú
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
wxw1981_2001
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 3372.9
- É¢½ð: 45
- ºì»¨: 120
- Ìû×Ó: 406
- ÔÚÏß: 217Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 451776
- ×¢²á: 2007-11-05
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: ʳƷ¿ÆÑ§»ù´¡
9Â¥2010-01-05 14:47:34
tianhu2003
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 5 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 9406.1
- É¢½ð: 10
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 1637
- ÔÚÏß: 248.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 601647
- ×¢²á: 2008-09-13
- רҵ: °ëµ¼Ìåµç×ÓÆ÷¼þ
4Â¥2010-01-05 14:11:34
butterfly1234
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1612.2
- Ìû×Ó: 591
- ÔÚÏß: 485.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 465390
- ×¢²á: 2007-11-22
- רҵ: ÎÞ»ú·Ç½ðÊôÀà¹âµçÐÅÏ¢Ó빦
5Â¥2010-01-05 14:13:54
dioxane
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 4 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 2172.5
- É¢½ð: 10
- ºì»¨: 4
- Ìû×Ó: 1018
- ÔÚÏß: 102.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 928477
- ×¢²á: 2009-12-15
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ½ðÊôÓлú»¯Ñ§

7Â¥2010-01-05 14:20:17













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥